Chris Conley Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Comp Tac doubles. Chris C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19852 Posted December 26, 2007 Share Posted December 26, 2007 CenDex single mag holders for double stack. Fobus double for single stack. I like two singles instead of one double, allows me to seperate them if I want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidewinder6 Posted January 22, 2008 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Who makes the double mag pouches that hold the mags in a V on your belt? Im looking for double stack ones for my G34. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RePete Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Who makes the double mag pouches that hold the mags in a V on your belt? Im looking for double stack ones for my G34. G-Code make those. http://www.gunnersalley.com/category/acces...agazineholders/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidewinder6 Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 (edited) Who makes the double mag pouches that hold the mags in a V on your belt? Im looking for double stack ones for my G34. G-Code make those. http://www.gunnersalley.com/category/acces...agazineholders/ Yup. Just what I was looking for. Many thanks for your response. Edited January 23, 2008 by Sidewinder6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdmoore Posted January 23, 2008 Share Posted January 23, 2008 (edited) I had a gcode several years ago that I sold with a gun. I got rid of it around the time of the new rules. I never measured it, but you want to make sure they aren't too canted if you are thinking IDPA. Edited January 23, 2008 by kdmoore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidewinder6 Posted January 24, 2008 Share Posted January 24, 2008 I had a gcode several years ago that I sold with a gun. I got rid of it around the time of the new rules. I never measured it, but you want to make sure they aren't too canted if you are thinking IDPA. Thanks for the heads up. Ill re-read the rule book. I didnt recall a restriction on the angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin c Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 UM double Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xfactor Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 right now ive decided on Bladetech singles w/ the tek lok...pretty neat .... Hi August, I've heard that Tek Lok is illegal for holsters - is it OK for mag pouches? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 right now ive decided on Bladetech singles w/ the tek lok...pretty neat .... Hi August, I've heard that Tek Lok is illegal for holsters - is it OK for mag pouches? Why would the Tek Lok be illegal for holsters? I have one that I use with my Single Stack and the only thing I can think of is about how far is pushes the holster from the body and I don't believe the Tek Lok pushes it out far enough to be illegal. Am I wrong about that? Anyone else come across this? -Albert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xfactor Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Why would the Tek Lok be illegal for holsters? ...the only thing I can think of is about how far is pushes the holster from the body and I don't believe the Tek Lok pushes it out far enough to be illegal... That's precisely why it's illegal for use with holsters in IDPA... not sure about mag pouches though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 Why would the Tek Lok be illegal for holsters? ...the only thing I can think of is about how far is pushes the holster from the body and I don't believe the Tek Lok pushes it out far enough to be illegal... That's precisely why it's illegal for use with holsters in IDPA... not sure about mag pouches though. I'm going to have to measure that out becuase from memory (and not having it in front of me) I don't think it does push out the holster far enough to be considered illegal and the test of being able to see daylight between the point of attachment and the inside of the body of the holster I thought had the Blade-Tech OWB with Tek Lok passed that test. Here's a picture straight from their website: It looks like it should be okay. I can't see where this would be considered illegal for IDPA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogiebb Posted February 14, 2008 Author Share Posted February 14, 2008 right now ive decided on Bladetech singles w/ the tek lok...pretty neat .... Hi August, I've heard that Tek Lok is illegal for holsters - is it OK for mag pouches? Hi Aaron, the pouches ive heard is ok for IDPA, i think the holster is too..im quite new to IDPA as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xfactor Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 (edited) I'm going to have to measure that out becuase from memory (and not having it in front of me) I don't think it does push out the holster far enough to be considered illegal and the test of being able to see daylight between the point of attachment and the inside of the body of the holster I thought had the Blade-Tech OWB with Tek Lok passed that test.... It looks like it should be okay. I can't see where this would be considered illegal for IDPA. the pouches ive heard is ok for IDPA, i think the holster is too..im quite new to IDPA as well I just checked the Blade-Tech web site, and they list the Tek-Lok mag pouch as "IDPA-APPROVED." They don't list the Tek-Lok holster as "IDPA-APPROVED" though... I also came across this thread while poking around this morning... post #29 in particular refers to an IDPA shooter that was FTDR'ed for using one. Personally, I really wish it were legal for IDPA; I prefer it to their SRB attachment. I'm just learning about IDPA too, but it sounds like some SO's won't give you a hard time for it, but others will. Edited February 14, 2008 by Xfactor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 I'm going to have to measure that out becuase from memory (and not having it in front of me) I don't think it does push out the holster far enough to be considered illegal and the test of being able to see daylight between the point of attachment and the inside of the body of the holster I thought had the Blade-Tech OWB with Tek Lok passed that test.... It looks like it should be okay. I can't see where this would be considered illegal for IDPA. the pouches ive heard is ok for IDPA, i think the holster is too..im quite new to IDPA as well I just checked the Blade-Tech web site, and they list the Tek-Lok mag pouch as "IDPA-APPROVED." They don't list the Tek-Lok holster as "IDPA-APPROVED" though... I also came across this thread while poking around this morning... post #29 in particular refers to an IDPA shooter that was FTDR'ed for using one. Personally, I really wish it were legal for IDPA; I prefer it to their SRB attachment. I'm just learning about IDPA too, but it sounds like some SO's won't give you a hard time for it, but others will. Xfactor, I appreciate the link to the thread. I've got to make sure this hasn't been ruled by IDPA HQ and wasn't just an issue at one club with a holster that had a Tek Lok attached to say the drop-offset attachment (which is illegal). I've not heard the Tek Lok attachment being illegal and it doesn't make sense that IDPA would allow it on mag pouches but not the holster. I took a few photos of my Tek Lok OWB Blade-Tech holster for my CDP gun and my Blade-Tech SRB OWB for my CZ 75B SP-01... Then I took a photo of just the Tek Lok holster with the calipers on them and even with the measuring to the inside of the Tek Lok attachment (to account for the use of the slimmest belt, dress belt?) to the outside of the the closest part of the OWB holster it does not even measure out to half and inch. I can't see how this would be ruled illegal. Again the match director of any sanctioned IDPA match would have final say, but measurements would give a strong argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xfactor Posted February 14, 2008 Share Posted February 14, 2008 Xfactor, I appreciate the link to the thread. I've got to make sure this hasn't been ruled by IDPA HQ and wasn't just an issue at one club with a holster that had a Tek Lok attached to say the drop-offset attachment (which is illegal). I've not heard the Tek Lok attachment being illegal and it doesn't make sense that IDPA would allow it on mag pouches but not the holster... My assumption was that the holster mounted to the Tek-Lok added a little extra offset that pushed it over the limit, where the mag pouch mounted to Tek-Lok was within the tolerance. I guess it depends on exactly how/where the measurements are taken... If you get a definitive response from the IDPA mother-ship, please let us know the final ruling! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now