caz41 Posted April 15, 2011 Author Share Posted April 15, 2011 That's what I was hoping to hear. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caz41 Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 There will be ample numbers produced. There should be some on the shelf by 4/29. Still nothing, any updates on when they will be around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Nukem Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Are you really going to carry one as a duty weapon? I have never seen a Para that would run well enough to bet my a$$ on. The FBI guns were hand built on Para frames and they didn't run either. There will be ample numbers produced. There should be some on the shelf by 4/29. Still nothing, any updates on when they will be around? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spd522 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Are you really going to carry one as a duty weapon? I have never seen a Para that would run well enough to bet my a$$ on. The FBI guns were hand built on Para frames and they didn't run either. There will be ample numbers produced. There should be some on the shelf by 4/29. Still nothing, any updates on when they will be around? All my Paras run more reliably than the Glock 17 I had. I still have them and the Glock is gone. A P12 I used to have was my off-duty piece until dept policy banned SA guns. It would even run 155 SWC ammo without a hiccup. Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caz41 Posted June 20, 2011 Author Share Posted June 20, 2011 The Tactical arrived the other day. Went to do some shooting. 200 rounds through it and I have not been able to get more than 4 rounds fired in a row without a fail to extract. I contacted Para and they told me to send it to them (on my dime) and that it would be minimum of a month to look at it. Needless to say I am not very pleased. Should I send it in, or add the sleeve and Aftec like many others have done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Nukem Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 I would just do the sleeve. I personally know of 4 different Paras that now work with the sleeve and a 39.00 EGW extractor. If you send it in to Para they are just going to say it works fine for them. In my experience I have never seen a USA made Para that will run out of the box. Its a shame Para makes the consumer a beta tester on a $1200.00 pistol. The Tactical arrived the other day. Went to do some shooting. 200 rounds through it and I have not been able to get more than 4 rounds fired in a row without a fail to extract. I contacted Para and they told me to send it to them (on my dime) and that it would be minimum of a month to look at it. Needless to say I am not very pleased. Should I send it in, or add the sleeve and Aftec like many others have done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParaGunner Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 I would just do the sleeve. I personally know of 4 different Paras that now work with the sleeve and a 39.00 EGW extractor. If you send it in to Para they are just going to say it works fine for them. In my experience I have never seen a USA made Para that will run out of the box. Its a shame Para makes the consumer a beta tester on a $1200.00 pistol. The Tactical arrived the other day. Went to do some shooting. 200 rounds through it and I have not been able to get more than 4 rounds fired in a row without a fail to extract. I contacted Para and they told me to send it to them (on my dime) and that it would be minimum of a month to look at it. Needless to say I am not very pleased. Should I send it in, or add the sleeve and Aftec like many others have done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
priler Posted July 11, 2011 Share Posted July 11, 2011 what i want to know is,why wouldn't para fit those BETTER parts on the limiteds. i mean specifically the EB national match bushing and the C&S hammer,sear and disconnector. it makes no sence given the purpose of the limiteds exept for cost cutting. in fact,imo,they belong there more than they do on the tactical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now