Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

tomv

Classifieds
  • Posts

    156
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tomv

  1. I just installede a Battle Arms Development stock on my AR .22. (pictures to follow) I opted for the rifle length and found that it resulted in a 12.5" LOP. Not bad, but the mid length stock is 1" shorter. I ordered one of those  to try and will exchange one of them for the length I like better. I'll end up with two of these of the right length for me. One on my 9mm AR and one on the .22.

  2. On 11/1/2019 at 3:21 PM, chinnerj said:

    Question: anyone here use a different grain bullet for training than for competition? I was thinking for next year I might order all of my training rounds in 115 and stick with 147 for my competition loads in order to save money. An important point I want to make is that I wouldn't plan on changing the charge weight of the powder as I would like to keep the felt recoil the same. I understand that the 115 grain loads would be way under PF, but wouldn't the recoil be the same since it is mostly determined by the charge weight and seating depth of the bullet? Just trying to find ways to save a little money here and there since there is a considerable difference between buying 115 vs. 147 grain projectiles.

    Recoil is based on momentum, Mass x Velocity. Also known as power factor. The 115 bullet with the 147 bullet powder charge will have significantly less mass resulting in lower pressure resulting in lower velocity. So both mass and velocity will be reduced and there will be a noticeable difference in recoil force. If you play with the charge to get the same power factor for both loads you will still notice a difference in how the gun runs. The slide will cycle much faster with the 115 load.

     

    I agree with bthe comment that it's best to practice with what you're using for competition.

  3. For Steel Challenge I shoot my PCC with about the same stance as I use for my pistols. I'm right handed so the toe of my right foot is a little in front of the heel of my left. The butt of the gun is toward the center of my chest. As a result of this I'm running about a 12" LOP. Almost everyone I hand my gun to comments that the LOP is too short for them.

     

    I'm curious to know how others stand and the geometry of their guns. Also would like comments on my approach.

     

     

  4. On 10/30/2019 at 9:25 AM, cecil said:

    I noticed that the Wiland barrel is not ramped according to the pictures... as is the Taccom 5.5" ULW barrel... is ramping a problem solver/advantage ?  

     

    tia

    Tim cut the ramp off my Taccom 9mm barrel because I'm using a Stern Defense mag adapter which has its own built in ramp.

  5. On 11/13/2019 at 4:31 AM, mrd said:

    Don't go too light on your buttplate/stock. It will make your rifle feel front heavy. Lots of proficient shooters go with heavy stocks to make the rifle swing/transition better. 

    I agree with this comment. My friend put a Mod Shot chassis on his 10-22 SC gun. Even though the gun was overall lighter, it did feel nose heavy.

    I ordered a Battle Arms stock for my ar15 .22 build. With the Taccom upper I don't think this will be the case because the nose of the gun is so light. Also ordered a Hogue 15D lightweight grip for the gun. With these additions the gun should end up weighing about 4# 4 oz.

×
×
  • Create New...