I did try Titewad with some success in .40 and .45ACP but had no luck getting any 9mm to reliably cycle with it except a H&K P7, even after raising the load until the primer started to flow (for a Glock though you should have no problem finding a really light recoil spring). If it just happens to be accurate with a near maximum load then it is really sweet for plinking and even softer and quieter than Clays, but seemed so touchy that I weighed every load on a Chargemaster. That got old fast.
I was happy with MG, PD + Zero .40 180 RNFP @ 3.5gr or 200 @ 2.9gr loaded short at 1.120", and plated + cast .45ACP 230 RN @ 3.4gr 1.250". The brass just dribbles out of the ejection port and falls straight down, but the cases are bulged and primers flattened just like full-power factory ammo, indicating pressures are maxed, but brief (it probably burns completely within the first half inch of barrel).
You may have noticed that it is really dirty at shotgun pressures but it cleans up at the high pressures you must use for a semi-auto--it's not the cleanest (and the residue is hard to scrub off unlike the greasy mess left by Titegroup) but it's cheap and you don't use much. For mouse fart loads I prefer the safer Tin Star or even N310 or Clays but if there's a powder shortage, Titewad will allow you to shoot if you take some care in reloading. It's certainly more flexible than Trail Boss which requires magnum primers in large revolver cartridges and .45ACP. It just takes up even less room in the case than Clays (hey it's more than Titegroup!).
There should be nearly no difference in pressures between HBRN and plain RN as the volume below the bullet is the same, just shaped differently. If anything the flat base will have lower pressures because the bearing surface is less which reduces friction. You can compare them in Quickload and see for yourself, but note Quickload has powder data to simulate all of the powders above... except Titewad.