Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

emjbe

Classified
  • Posts

    159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by emjbe

  1. On 5/24/2018 at 5:06 PM, motosapiens said:

     

    i think that's the idea, so that old people and sissies and pre-teen girls and 3-gunners (yeah, i know, lots of overlap in these categories) can score major without having to be able to actually *handle* major pf recoil, and the rest of us have to buy new guns.

     

    I've been called old people, sissy, and 3-gunner ... and you still had me laughing out loud with that one. ? 

  2. Had lasik done in 2010 at age 41. It’s awesome - no regrets and no negatives. 

     

    Id give the same advise that Larry gave about right/left eyes for distance and near -I can’t see the front sight on a pistol any more.  Right after lasik it wasn’t an issue but in the last 2 years I’ve noticed the aging eyes have a hard time seeing close objects. My left eye can focus perfectly on the front sight but I’m right eye dominant. 

     

    Since having it done I’ve learned about other options that may have been better.  Also in my research at the time I learned the machine the doctor uses is a critical factor in good results.  You have to be sure they dr is using the latest tech to avoid many of the issues discussed in this thread. 

  3. 18 hours ago, Sarge said:

    PCC?

     

    it was a BCM 5.56 chamber.

     

    It was during a black rifle match here in AZ.  Stage 3 had a 100 second par time to shoot 2 8" targets at about 275 yards and 2 plates at about 75 yards as many times as you could hit within  the time.  I blew through about 50 rounds then flagged the rifle with a plastic chamber flag.  

     

    got to stage 4 and started make ready and the flag came right out of the rifle but the extended plastic part stayed in the chamber.  It had to be hammered out with a rod then scraped out with a chamber brush.

     

    The chamber flag was one of the clear plastic ones.  

     

    Lesson learned.

     

     

  4. On 5/14/2018 at 6:24 PM, RiggerJJ said:

    Ask Ralph Arredondo about using random pieces of plastic in hot barrels for chamber flags...not a good idea.

     

    I had a chamber flag melt in my chamber between stages a few months back.  After that, nothing goes into my chamber except bullets.

  5. 21 minutes ago, Wheelsonly said:

     

    Have the hiperfire eclipse  I would only run it on my .22 or pcc not my taste for a rifle trigger 

     I shot 3gun with a hiperfire eclipse for about 6months and liked it so much I bought another one for my son when they went on sale.  

     

    Its interesting the different preferences in triggers. I really like the feel of that wide shoe and I like a long single stage so I’m digging the Calvin and eclipse most right now. 

  6. On 3/1/2018 at 9:03 AM, bagdrag said:

    Anyone know how the Timney AR Calvin and Timney AR Targa compare to the AR Gold and Trigger Tech? 

     

    I have a Calvin and a trigger tech.  

    Shot the Calvin in 2 matches so far and it was perfect.  Great reset and felt very good on fast paper and long range.  I really like the adjustable shoe - I thought it was a gimmick when I first saw one but I’m a believer after putting that shoe exactly where it feels best.  

     

    i like the feel of the triggger tech 2nd stage, but after I got it I learned I don’t like 2stage triggers during competition so I moved it to a varmint rifle.  The AR gold is 2 stage so I didn’t consider it.  As an aside my trigger tech had some consistent failure to follow problems in one rifle and they took great care of me helping troubleshoot and giving me every possible option to make it right.  

  7. I shot an RT-6 on my friend's rifle and I felt it was marginally better than the Strike Eagle/Primary Arms scopes.  On 1x there was noticeable optical shift transitioning between targets back and forth (I don't know if that's the right term ... basically it looked like the picture coming through the glass was distorted/wavy about the same as a strike eagle).  I don't notice that effect on a steiner p4xi or the $1000+ scopes I've used.

     

    The reticle was great and glass was good at 200-300 yards.  

     

    If it were true daylight bright, I'd probably look at it more.

     

    In the ~$450-$500 price range I'd say the Steiner is better at short range paper 3gun stages and mid range out to 300 yards even at 1-4x just because of the daylight visible dot and the better glass. If your matches do a lot past 300 yards, then that 6x would help.

  8. I'm happy with the Leupold VX-6HD 1-6.  I would like it to have a daylight bright dot, but other than that it has what I need for 3gun - my priorities are: big eyebox, reticle matches my loads almost perfectly, locking turrets (Originally I wished they were capped, but the locks work fine).

     

    Light weight is a nice addition and one of the primary reasons I went with the Leupold over the Razor,  but it's not high on my priority list any more.

     

    I've also shot the Steiner P4Xi in a few matches and I liked it also but some 6" plates at 280 yards in the rifle matches made me switch back to 1-6x.

  9. 9 hours ago, troupe said:

    A little tip for my fellow shooters, Chandler Hardwoods Inc.  They are all I use. They have worked very well for me.  Someone will complain that they are cheap. I have never had a issue and I have sold all of my stupid priced tubes now that I know better. A can of Krylon works great on the bare alum.

     

    wow - those are the lowest prices I've seen.  Do you use these for 3gun? (dumping in barrels and the like)?

  10. 9 hours ago, troupe said:

    Looks like a high priced, fluted barrel. Many barrels out there will do the same for less money.  Check with Dan Lilja, works for JP.  I shoot Satern barrels. Very, Very accurate barrels.  18" 223 Wylde DF Med Rifle barrel $285  Medium contour, rifle gas , double fluted, 5 R rifling.  My rifles are .5 or less.  No crazy warranty void for reloads.

     

    I think it depends on what you want from a barrel.  The higher priced BAD weighs in at 24.6oz and includes the cryogenic treatment.  That Medium contour Satern looks like about 30-34 oz.  I think the people who are willing to pay more for the BAD want the lower weight and acceptable accuracy instead of higher weight and .5 or better accuracy.  Also - I saw those Satern barrels come with a headspace bolt for the price ... they look like a lot of goodness for the price.

     

    as an aside to @troupe... I have to travel to North Carolina for work tomorrow through Friday.  If you know of any ranges near the Charlotte airport that would rent out a Glock so I could get some practice in, could you let me know? 

  11. 23 hours ago, Flatland Shooter said:

    In my quest to get a PCC that shoots decent groups at UML distances, I went through six barrels before I found one that would consistently hit an 8" plate at 100 yards.  I blew through a lot of ammo during the search in bullet weights from 98 gr to 160 gr, each loaded to several different PFs.

     

    I had to quickly rule out coated and plated bullets.  Jacketed bullets in the 121 to 125 gr range running a bit hotter gave the best results.

     

    When testing, I used an 18x scope, bipod and sandbags.

     

    So my opinion is that using an untested (at 100 yards or more) barrel with random ammo, your good shooter would need luck rather than skill.

     

    I guess I got lucky ... my first pcc is an ATI 9mm that hits about 10 MOA consistently, so not as good as yours, but acceptable for what I shoot.  I'm working on loads for a JP upper that seems to be about 6 MOA using bayou bullets.  I tried target hollow points and several other plated bullets but they all seemed to jam more frequently than the bayou 9mm 124g bullets in both PCCs.  So I use the coated bullets exclusively in my PCC for better reliability.  

  12. My 18" AR barrel liked 69g SMKs the best.  I really wanted the heavier 77g, but they just didn't shoot as tight. This is a Quentin Defense 18" 3gun barrel

     

    In order the bullets I found to be the most accurate (all using TAC):

    69g SMK (1380) consistently below .5 moa - best group was .32" at 100

    69g Barnes BTHP Match

    68g Everglades match 

    70g Barnes HPBT Tac-X

    55g Hornady SP 2266n - averaged about .75" groups at 100 - best group .52"

    69g Nosler HPBT

    77g SMK 

    75g Hornady BTHP consistently about 1.5 moa

     

    I was surprised that the lighter bullets did so much better ... but I ended up settling on the 69g SMK for long distance and the 55g SP 2266 for hoser ammo.  

     

    did all these tests about 2 years ago and I haven't taken them out to check on paper but the 69g SMKs hit 3gun steel 200-535 yards and the 55g 2266 does great inside 200.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...