Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

jlo86cj

Classified
  • Posts

    166
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jlo86cj

  1. 20 minutes ago, Flatland Shooter said:

    I've never seen one of these Kydex cradles.  What is the benefit?

     

    I did come across a YouTube video of a left handed shooter in Florida that had his buttstock on the belt, his weak hand on the handguard and his strong hand flat against his leg (not touching the gun).  I don't know if that's just the way he wants to start or there was something in the WSB limiting where the strong hand needed to be.

     

    Checked to see if a WSB could require a PCC start with only one hand on the gun.  Found nothing that indicated the MD cannot specify only one hand on the gun.  In the same area of the rules I did not see anything permitting or prohibiting a Kydex cradle for the buttstock.

     It's pretty much the required PCC start position at any Manny Bragg match down here. Not bad once you practice it a little.

  2. I ran my first test with it over the weekend...

     

    gun: Shadow 1

    bullet: Gallant Bullets coated 9mm 147

    charge: 3.3gr

    primer: WSP

    oal: 1.100

    string: 10 shots at 10 feet

    avg mv: 895 (132pf)

    es: 17

    sd: 5

     

    So far I'm sold on it. No more smoke than N320 and time will tell if it's as clean. I'll be testing some at 3.2gr today at lunch.

  3. Hello: I wish they made a Glock 17 one and a Sig MPX one. Thanks, Eric


    They had one for the MPX at SHOT 2016, but it's never made it to market. I asked recently and they still plan on releasing it, but wouldn't give me an ETA.

    In TF's latest newsletter he says they are coming out with a +20 for the MPX this year.
  4. Agreed, the spring bind is not a problem -- I stated that I tested that and found there wasn't any spring bind.  The problem is that the buffer is now too long to function as before.  I took out the cushion and replaced it with the original hex screw and it functions fine without the additional length of the cushion.
     
    I would like to continue this discussion in order to get a better resolution.  1st, from your website:
    • For carbine buffer tubes only
    • For use in blow back actions only
    • Comes with TACCOM Rifle spring
    • 6.2 ounces
    • 2 stage action
    • Allows for the BHO to functioin
    • Also available with the “3rd” cushion stage
    So, with no other information to the contrary that I have found (I read everything I could find) the BHO was initially designed to work.  Your "Bottom line" statement has no bearing on anything about your buffer.  I don't even know why you wrote it.  I am sure I am not the only person that would like LRBHO or to be able to easily lock the slide back and not have to release it by slamming the heal of their hand against the bolt release. 
     
    As I said, your addition of the cushion lengthened the buffer and I feel this is the cause of the problem.  I suggested trimming the piston the amount the cushion lengthened the buffer could be a solution.  You suggest taking out the delrin pad to allow for more space for the longer buffer setup.  I can see this could be a solution, but I would rather keep the delrin pad.
     
    I am going to trim the end of the piston (the end that hits the delrin pad) the thickness that was added by the cushion.  All I want to know is if you feel there would be any detriment to doing this as far as mechanics or safety.
     
    Thanks
     
    PS, if this works as I feel it should, I think that you should offer a shorter piston to your customers with the cushion.  Not everyone has a mill, like I do.  This would only enhance your well earned (from what I have read) reputation.
     


    Shortening the piston will not do anything. You need to shorten the overall compressed assembly the amount the cushion added from the main buffer body. I would suggest the end the cushion is on.
×
×
  • Create New...