Whoops,
first of all: it was for sure not my intention to offend you and/or your line of actions...
I just wanted to express my astonishment about some of the points you made, which brought me to some of my guesses..
Well - as I mentioned in one of my remarks: as I will meet Saul this weekend I will discuss that bad cases with him (as none of that ever occured over here) and see what he has to say....
And last but not least to your information:
- No I am not dealing with that stuff and no I have no job-related correlation to the producer.
- But: I work amongst others with an Fed.Institute for Material Testing and last autumn we contacted more than 500 shooters in our area with a questionayr-form regarding to their shooting-equipment in detail (such as what guns, what mags, what optics, what mounts..., occurring problems a.s.o.). The analysis of that forms arised amongst other issues what I quoted in my remark: more than 90 (exact quote: 93) of them use the 3-in-1-mount and stated no problems with that stuff at all (no cracks, no loosing parts, no negative remarks according to functionality, execution of construction-work a.s.o.).
Regards
Wolfgang