Rufftytuffty Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 (edited) Just in the final steps of finalizing my 50 setup have rifle, scope & case all sorted out. The last piece of the puzzle is rings...so a question to all you 50 cal shooters out there: What height rings are you using and would you change it? SCOPE => 56mm objective. 1.20 seems standard. 1.30 ? 1.40 ? Also, need to consider the possible install of a long rail for any NV needs down the road. ~Mike Edited November 4, 2009 by Rufftytuffty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Freeman Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Barrel countour? Exactly what type of 50 is it? Bolt gun receivers can be a lot lower than some other styles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufftytuffty Posted November 4, 2009 Author Share Posted November 4, 2009 (edited) It's a TAC-50...i know Mcmillan use a 1.20 ring as standard. The trouble is i would like to try BORS down the road and maybe NV...this could lead me to be buying 3 sets of rings $$$. What i understand is that height has two main effects...cheekweld and loss of MOA. Cheekweld shouldn't be an issue as i have 1.5" of stock travel. MOA loss becomes an issue out past 1,500 yds but as i'm using a NF 22 i do have 100 MOA to play with. ~Mike Edited November 4, 2009 by Rufftytuffty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill T Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 This is my Bushmaster BA-50 set up. I went with Smith Enterprises .50 BMG Rings and a AR-15 steel riser also from Smith Enterprises. My reason was this set up will allow me to go to most any scope on the market without having to purchase additional equipment. My current scope is a Bushnell 3200 Elite Tactical. But as you can see I have plenty of room for a much larger objective if I choose to go that route. I can't say enough good about the Smith Enterprises rings. They come with beautifully matched steel, double flanged, 1" bushings that fit so well, they just "snap" into place. Again, if I want to go to a 30 MM scope, all I have to do is lose the bushings, and I'm all set. None of this stuff was cheap, but I like the versatility it gives me. Bill T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufftytuffty Posted January 20, 2010 Author Share Posted January 20, 2010 Nice setup Bill. I ended up going with the BARRETT ultra-high rings they are 1.4"...it worked out great. I did have to dial down ~25 MOA to get sighted in but that is not unusual. I also have the adjustable cheek weld up high but its not maxed out. ~Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan O Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I understand the worry about ring height with NV and maybe I'm asking a stupid question but how would ring height be a factor with BORS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufftytuffty Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share Posted February 11, 2010 I understand the worry about ring height with NV and maybe I'm asking a stupid question but how would ring height be a factor with BORS? No height issue with BORS itself but you need to use BARRETT rings. ~Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan O Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I understand the worry about ring height with NV and maybe I'm asking a stupid question but how would ring height be a factor with BORS? No height issue with BORS itself but you need to use BARRETT rings. ~Mike OOOHHH, I see, I was just curious. I went and looked a Barrett's website at that too. In the world of gunporn their website is like the hardcore stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now