Darrell Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 All these are with Berry's Plated 147 RN Bullets seated at an OAL of 1.42" Crimped at .380. Tightgroup powder. Weight Velocity SD ES Power Factor 15yd 10shot Group average 3.2 874 11 34 128.5 3.8" 3.4 917 8.4 26 134.7 4.4" 3.6 Chrono died 4.1" WSF Powder 15yd 5shot best 3 shots 3.7 885 8.9 29 130.1 4.1" 1.85 3.9 915.8 16 47 134.6 3.31" 1.27 4.1 940.7 14.5 35 138.2 3.37" 1.64 231 powder 3.3 NO Chrono data 2.95" .875" 3.4 853.7 15.2 47 125.4 2.79" 1.41" 3.5 873.1 10.1 23 128.3 2.58" 1.0" 3.6 876.4 10.6 34 128.8 2.0 " .729" Overall my M&P out shot my Springfield 1911 9mm today, seems the M&P is more accurate out the box than the springer. Best load today was 3.6 of 231 for the M&P, I will experiment later with a tighter crimp, and maybe different OAL, but it seemed to really like 231. Also CCI 115gr blazers shot better too with a velocity of 1121fps SD was 12.5 ES was 37 PF was 128.9 group at 15 yds was 1.3" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harmon Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 did you think the titegroup felt the best? 231 shot good in my guns, but titegroup seemed to shoot softer, but less accurate. Harmon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Posted December 4, 2006 Author Share Posted December 4, 2006 Didn't notice that much difference in recoil impulse, but then again I was just testing for accuracy and shot over a hundred rounds total. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyT Posted December 4, 2006 Share Posted December 4, 2006 Didn't notice that much difference in recoil impulse, but then again I was just testing for accuracy and shot over a hundred rounds total. I have had a similar experience as yours with the springer. Using both plated and jacketed bullets in my S&W 99 and Springfield 1911 I have found that in all cases the shorter barreled S&W 99 outshot my Springfield 1911. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rstandley Posted December 11, 2006 Share Posted December 11, 2006 I loaded some accura 147 gr. tmj today with 3.5 grs. of HP-38. Shot out of a Glock-34 with stock barrel, runs averaged 856 fps. It would hold a tight group doing double tap drills. The gun was very controlable with a mild report. I like this load better than the 3.1 charge of titegroup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harmon Posted December 17, 2006 Share Posted December 17, 2006 FWIW blazer ammo chronos at 139 ish pf in my Stock glock 34 barrel, 132 ish in the Storm lake barrel.. This is the older stuff with a TMJ plated bullet not the newer jacketed stuff. despite the upper level minor PF, my gun still gets silly malfunctions with that aluminum cased ammo on the last round...(stove pipe) the 147 grian Titegroup load even at lower PF never did that. Harmon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allgoodhits Posted December 18, 2006 Share Posted December 18, 2006 Didn't notice that much difference in recoil impulse, but then again I was just testing for accuracy and shot over a hundred rounds total. Applying your data with gun weight of 2 lbs. TG 147 gr 3.2 gr 874fps pulse .63 free recoil 3.16 lb/ft WSF 147 gr 3.7 gr 885fps pulse .64 free recoil 3.33 lb/ft 231 147 gr 3.6 gr 876fps pulse .64 free recoil 3.25 lb/ft Recoil Calculator Virtually insignificant scientifically, it's whatever you like and what you gun likes. MJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now