AsherRoe Posted April 21, 2020 Share Posted April 21, 2020 Can someone tell me why does a Black mamba cost more than scorpion 22/45 ? The black mamba is using a factory polymer Ruger frame.... But the scorpion has a nice aluminum 22/45 frame and the back mamba cost more ?.. Scratching my head on this .... maybe I’m missing something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcschwenke Posted April 21, 2020 Share Posted April 21, 2020 I wonder the same thing as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AsherRoe Posted April 22, 2020 Author Share Posted April 22, 2020 Yep .. I understand the takedown is nice ,I have a mk4 . But just seems like a lot of money for their complete upper and trigger kit.. I wish they could design the takedown into their nice VC target frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ammoeater Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 They have to buy the MKIV frames instead of making them. Patent rights on the frame prevent them from making them as of now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
will77 Posted September 16, 2020 Share Posted September 16, 2020 I've been wondering the same took my 10 year old son to his first steel challenge he's hooked and burning through 22's at an alarming rate!!! He shoots a 22/45 with a fast fire dot and its been flawless. But he watched some YouTube vids and now Really wants the black mamba. I will say the mark 3 22/45 is pain to strip and clean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now