Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

philippshen

Classified
  • Posts

    100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by philippshen

  1. 39 minutes ago, SCTaylor said:

     

     

    Multiple internal differences and the big one externally is grip size.  Is it worth the extra? I think that is all up to the individual.

     
     
     

     

    33 minutes ago, MissionaryMike said:

     

    By all internet accounts, an out of the box comparison is apples to oranges.  The Shadow 2 is built race ready at a primo price.  The Stock 3 basically needs a complete overhaul, which ends up costing the same as the Shadow 2 out of the box.  To be fair, an out of the box Shadow 2 might need a bit more work to perform as good as an optimized Stock 3, but probably not that much.  And as mentioned, there are internal changes that could be seen as improvements.  

     
     
     

     

    33 minutes ago, B_RAD said:

    It is if you're already set up with mags.  

     

     

    Not mention the cost will be close to the same once you replace all the factory parts.  

     
     
     

     

     

    Appreciate all the comments, now I'd like to give it a try if I can find one,

     

    with that being said, I just made the switch from Glock to CZs (had S2 before, grip just too large for my small hand),  I need to shoot a lot more to fully appreciate the awesomeness of CZs:D

  2. On 2/21/2017 at 4:38 PM, B_RAD said:

    I bet reloads can be done while sleeping with a magwell on there!  For me, CZ are already easy to reload.   

     

     

     
     

     

    Lol, maybe not as easy as modified tanfo magwell, I wish we can do the same kind of bevel to CZs 

  3. 30 minutes ago, B_RAD said:

    I thought the Titan does come on the extreme line. 

     

    It's a moot point for me because I'm gonna shoot my CZ all year. Maybe next year I'll switch over. I do love the Tanfo!

    1

    Current extreme has delta hammer I think. I tried both CZ and Tanfo, the grip of CZ just fit my hand better:D, but I'd like to try small frame tanfos, wish EAA will import those again.

     

    BTW, as you mentioned in another topic, Limited Pro is no long on the EAA 2017 catalog. I checked Tanfoglio 2017 catalog, and there is no Limited pro either, seems like it was replaced by the new Stock I pistol. So, limited Pro discontinued? <_<

  4. 26 minutes ago, B_RAD said:

    Stock 3 could be made to make weight. 

     

    Nobody can prove it can't make weight with the right parts replaced, so it's legal.  Then if it's legal, the Titan hammer is legal. 

     

     

    59 minutes ago, philippshen said:

    Here you go! 

    Why not remove grips completely, no rule said you can't shoot without grips:D

    You can also put polymer guide rod in it, punch holes on the magazine tube, remove the rear sight, B)

     

     

    However, we still have another problem here, titan hammer does not come installed on any factory pistols yet (current extreme line pistols in the States), but they will be in the future according to the Tanfoglio 2017 Catalog, I guess will just have to wait then.

     

     

     

     

    Almost, just wait until they made 2k of new stock 3 extreme this year.

  5. 6 minutes ago, MemphisMechanic said:

    Strip the sights and safeties off... fill the grips with helium...

    Here you go! 

    Why not remove grips completely, no rule said you can't shoot without grips:D

    You can also put polymer guide rod in it, punch holes on the magazine tube, remove the rear sight, B)

     

     

    However, we still have another problem here, titan hammer does not come installed on any factory pistols yet (current extreme line pistols in the States), but they will be in the future according to the Tanfoglio 2017 Catalog, I guess will just have to wait then.

     

  6. 4 minutes ago, JusticeOfToren said:

    I am not an expert in CZ parts, but if a Shadow uses a factory hammer manufactured for a non-SSP legal model, then the Shadow is illegal too, correct?  I guess the key is that you have to pin point the specific hammer to the specific model that is SSP legal.  It can be hard...  I know people shoot their Shadow in SSP with CGW hammer, comp hammer etc, but I never know if those hammers are from an SSP legal CZ pistol or not.  

     
     

     

     

    You are right. However, there are actually few shadows from CZUB that came with comp hammer installed, namely shadow line and shadow orange, since we rarel see those pistols on the market,  I am assuming they made this on purpose.

  7. 11 minutes ago, B_RAD said:

    Hmmm.......

     

     

    I noticed they're not listed in the Tanfo catalog anymore.  

     

     

    you are right, I just checked, that's interesting, are they discounted? no wonder they are out everywhere.

     

    I also noticed a new offering from SAR, looks like a tanfo limited custom knock off

  8. I saw a youtube video today which point out the illegality of Titan hammer on Ltd Pro in IDPA SSP division, here is the rule I found from the 2017 IDPA rule book, 

     

    IDPA Rule 8.2.1.2 

    section C.

    Magazine releases, slide stops, safety levers, de-cocking levers, hammers, and triggers, that are stock on one SSP

    legal firearm may be used on another SSP legal firearm from the same manufacturer provided they are drop in replacements. Parts in this list must come factory installed on standard production firearms. Special parts that are available installed only from a factory custom shop are not eligible in SSP.

     

    From what I understand, this rule kicks out both Delta and Titan hammer, possibly other extreme parts as well.

    What do you guys think?

×
×
  • Create New...