Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

elguapo

Classifieds
  • Posts

    939
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by elguapo

  1. Reasons why I have zero interest in 3 gun

    1. A multitude of rule sets + outlaw.  If I had no other objections, this one is enough to ever keep me from trying it.
    2. Shotgun.  I have no practical use for a shotgun tailored to 3 gun.  Not gonna run out and buy all the stuff that needs to go with it either
    3. Time.  USPSA pushes up to my redline of how much waiting vs shooting I do and how long does the match take overall.  3 gun will not be better and will likely be worse.  Edit: I just saw a post mentioning 12  - 14 hour match days.  LOL forget it.
    4. All the stuff one has to take to keep 3 guns running at a match.  As time goes on I gravitate to shooting sports that minimize that aspect.

    Just find nothing appealing about any of this

  2. 23 hours ago, Hoops said:

    Our location does not host a Steel Challenge match.  Usual drive to one is hour fifteen minutes.  We do have Outlaw Steel matches.  Single shooters box similar to SCSA.  Over the past couple of years we have seen a shift to more targets per stage (5 bays).  Poppers, plate racks, stars and knockoffs.  Up to 40 targets in a bay.  3 hour matches for 5 bays.   Who doesn't like to mow down a sea of steel...right?   But over the last 6 months we have had a steady decline in participation......especially newer, younger shooters.  Discussing this amoung ourselves, we believe that we have made the matches too difficult and losing single stack, revolver and out of the box stock pistol shooters who get frustrated with several reloads per stage etc.  The question is where is the balance between challenging but fun enough to encourage new shooters to want to come back?

     

     (We are discussing an official Steel Challenge match but nothing firm yet).   

     

    3 hours of shooting and resetting steel?  No thanks.  Waaaayyy too long.

     

    PS, why would someone get frustrated by having to reload a few times during a stage?  Maybe that's an indication that they need to work on that skill.

  3. 9 hours ago, happygunner77 said:

    IPSC style means more moving, partial targets. 

     

    More as in how many more/how much more often?

     

    To be quite honest I had to go look on youtube.  Searched for IPSC production (since that's what I shoot) and lo and behold about 95% of the IPSC stages I saw look pretty much like the ones I see several times a month in USPSA matches.  Only main difference I noticed was a slightly more frequent use of swingers/movers/disappearing targets.

     

    Overall it looked the same as what I'm used to.

  4. On ‎11‎/‎3‎/‎2019 at 10:50 AM, anonymouscuban said:

    I shot my first memory stage last month. There were multiple ways to shoot this and none of them were truly superior over the other. You can shoot while moving and it really took some thinking to make sure you didn't forget to engage targets. Many did. I did. I was doing well, then my mag didn't seat correctly. Threw me off mentally and I ended up with a failure to engage one target. UGH. Loads of fun though.
    24771b700a8143f6c8e04027436d2803.jpg

    Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
     

     

    I would stop going to a club that would make stuff like that a regular feature.  Luckily where I live we rarely see those kinds of stupid stages and I have several clubs within a reasonable drive.

  5. 7 hours ago, Tokarev said:

    This probably means the pistol pictured above is not legal in IDPA unless I add the mag disconnect back in.  Then I'd have to source the factory BHP mags with the mousetrap spring.

     

    Thanks, Bill...

     

    "Disconnecting or disabling of any safety device including (but not limited to): manual safeties, grip safeties, firing

    pin, striker, and hammer blocking safeties, 1911 series 80 firing pin safeties, 1911 Swartz safeties. 1911 series 80

    frames may be used with series 70 slides or vice versa. Revolver actions may not be modified so that the

    hammer can fall when the cylinder is open."
     

     

    Not so.

     

    You're looking in the wrong place.  Look one section above that one in the 2017 rules (the current one)

     

    8.1.7 Allowable Modifications for All Divisions
    The following modification rules apply to firearms in all divisions.
       A. Storage locks may be disabled or removed.
       B. Magazine disconnects may be disabled or removed.

     

    So yes, your pistol with the magazine disconnect disabled/removed is absolutely 100% legal for IDPA (assuming something else that is disallowed hasn't been done to it).

  6. On ‎11‎/‎3‎/‎2019 at 2:02 PM, shred said:

    IMO those kinds of memory stages are weak-- not very fun nor technical.  There's nothing to them but show up early enough to find the shooting spots or get the plan from someone and that's it.  They suck at majors (esp IPSC majors when you can't pre-walk) when your squad starts on it and by halfway through day 2, everyone else knows the best plan.

     

    There's little shooting challenge, just remembering what to shoot when.  That gets old after you've seen it half a dozen times.... (FWIW I feel the same about any other stage designs where the designers goal is to screw shooters up, because funny, but lots of people seem to like them. )

     

     

     

    100% agree

  7. 16 hours ago, DeweyH said:

     As Shred stated in an earlier post,  Major isn't scored higher because of difficulty of shooting major, but because of the extra damage it does to a target.  This would be a target in the real world.  

     

    That "extra damage" of larger caliber handgun bullets has been extensively proven to be false by modern studies.  Dr. Gary K. Roberts for one, and I'm sure there are others.

     

    Power factor is a left over of the bad old days when people extrapolated terminal ballistics on the human body by shooting a pendulum and measuring how far it swung...…..LOL.

  8. On ‎11‎/‎2‎/‎2019 at 6:12 PM, 1911vm said:

    Now i am confused  which one Lok Palm Swell and Armanov SpidErgo. It looks like LOK  has a bit bigger  Palm swell .  does any one have both? i searched for a compare between the two. and found nothing.  almost considering just staying with the factory ones LOL they just look like s$%t LOL

     

    I have medium sized hands (glove size 8 ) with fingers on the short side.  The LOK palm swells were too big for me.

  9. On ‎10‎/‎30‎/‎2019 at 1:44 PM, CGoodwin said:

    I shoot a SP-01 Tactical in SSP. The advantage is the ability to start in the "half cocked" position resulting in a slightly shorter and lighter pull.  Plus I have always shot DA/SA decocker pistols and never put in the time on manual safety guns.

     

    Same here (with a 75BD and a P-09 set up with the decocker).  I prefer that both IDPA and USPSA rules require you can start from the half cock notch with decocker CZs instead of having to lower it all the way down manually. 

     

    I read all over the internet that you can't get as good a trigger with decocker CZs as you can otherwise.  Then I go do my own trigger job and find out that the people who say that have never actually done it so they're just repeating what they read or heard elsewhere.

  10. 57 minutes ago, nikdanja said:

    I’m weird. Even when I’m not up, I usually don’t talk to my buddies.  After I shoot the stage I’ll yuk it up but until then, I’m zone into our. 

     

    I pretty much move off from the gaggle and stop pasting/resetting 2 - 3 shooters ahead of me.  I've been rehearsing my stage plan the whole time but 2 - 3 away from go time I go into deep visualization.

  11. On ‎8‎/‎20‎/‎2019 at 12:45 PM, dennisw1mac said:

    68845652_10158898112666980_5024322922626

     

    I still don't see takedown levers in the Production appendix section that lists which external parts that can be replaced with aftermarket.

     

    So regardless of some e-mail from whomever, I'd bump someone to open for it

×
×
  • Create New...