randyb

[edit] I'm sticking with the idea that 2 hits is enough to stop a bad guy or a hostage and it doesn't make any sense to count one more than the other.

Tell him to face uprange just like it says in LAMR rule 8.3.1.

I just don't get what all the fuss is about. If it takes 2 shots to kill a bad guy, it takes two shots to kill a hostage. Now THAT's simple as it gets. Why count more shots on the hostage if he's standing in front of 4 bad guys? Either two shots kills him or they don't. Leave the rule the hell alone!

How can you use a Browning in Production Class? Their single action aren't they?

You b&m about a procedural for holding a mag in your hand as a sighting aid but then you want to dq a guy for holding an ASP red gun as a sigthing aid?

Why's it called "single-stack" division when you can't shoot ANY single-stack, only a 1911?

I don't think you can change bipods for different stages but if its a euro match you oughta check at the IPSC forum where all the top IPSC rules guys hang out and reply really quickly. http://ipsc.invisionzone.com/

Why don't we just go back to no divisions and only have overall scoring with every shooter together? Why hassle with so many divisions? We can stop arguments about Limited 10 and singlestacks. Production can use full mags since the AWB died and drop the stupid behind the armpits rule. Also revolvers with scopes have a chance to do better. 3 GUN will be simpler too. Just shoot what ya brung, winner take all.