just my two cents worth...
one of the original selling points of the L10 division was that hi-cap mags were extremely expensive/unobtainable. With the dissolution of the 1994 Crime bill, this is no longer the case. Those guys plugging away with widebody guns in L10 would have no problem finding mags to shoot in Limited. I am opposed to creating a NEW division for SS shooters because the previously discussed dilution of the level of competition (if we have enough divisions, maybe even I could become a national champion). I believe that the sensible option would be to make L10 into a SS 8-round division but not restricted to 1911's (Sig 220's, S&W 1045's, etc. would be fine too). As noted before, almost every gun company on earth is now producing or plans to produce a single stack 1911. In my opinion, we simply can't afford to ignore that level of potential sponsorship for our shooters and matches. Just look at the number of new sponsorships which have resulted from the Production class (Glock, Sig, CZ all have sponsored shooters and regularly donate prizes to matches). I feel that the same phenomenon would occur if L10 became SS only. Para-Ord, STI, etc. who are already stellar sponsors make single stacks in addition to their widebodies. I don't feel that the change wuld hurt them at all, and might boost sales of SS models.
Further, we have to consider new shooters. Almost every new shooter in USPSA stares with either a SS 1911 or a Glock. They may graduate to something else later, but that's where we generally all start. At our local club match yesterday, we had 40 shooters...16 of which shot SS 1911's. A quick poll told me that most of these guys were not USPSA members, had no current classification, and had never attended a major match. They simply felt that they didn't have the equipment to compete.
We need to get these guys involved with USPSA and major matches without further dilluting our level of competition, while attracting new sponsors to our sport at the same time. Losing current L10 to a SS division might be a small price to pay.
mark