I've been shooting a new Stock III S.E. in parallel with my trusted 2 yr old CZ SP01 Shadow for 2 months now. 3k rounds between the 2 guns later, I still haven't found a clear winner yet so I kinda have to agree with conclusion of the review. Also here in Canada we have great distributor support behind both brands, so that's not a factor.
I ran bench rest sessions with no difference in groups and various offhand timed drills at anywhere from 5 to 25 yards and could not on an objective basis give an overall edge to either guns. Both guns have been eating a steady diet of mixed brass reloads without a single failure (as in 0), operator induced or otherwise, so excellent reliability on both sides of the aisle.
Out of the box the Stock III trigger is just OK, which comes as a disappointment given that it is more expensive of the 2 guns. However it it improves a lot after a good polish/deburr, and the infamous DA stacking becomes much less noticeable with a lighter mainspring ( I agree 100% with Neatio, some Wolf main springs need to be cut or else you're pushing against a solid steel tube if the coils are touching). Also I had to swap the Tanfo iron front sight for a fiber dot. Fiber is standard on the SP01 Shadow.
The CZ is shooter right out of the box, and a fantastic value for the money, so if that's you main criteria... well there you go!
As for the Tanfo, I paid more $ for the Stock III SE and had to spend a few hours polishing/deburring and messing around with springs just to make it as good as the CZ. On the flip side the Nickel finished Special Edition Stock III is a hot piece of holster candy, so guess which one is most likely to be at my hip at the next local IPSC match? No one said it had to be fair.