Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

staudacher

Classifieds
  • Posts

    397
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by staudacher

  1. The old long strut flexes and makes for a somewhat uneven DA pull especially with heavier mainsprings. They came out with the short strut and plastic base to solve the flex issue. The E2 has yet another strut and base design in order to clear the E2 grips. The downside is the strut binds so going to "standard" grips would allow the E2 strut and base to be replaced with the "standard" short strut and plastic base.

    FWIW, I run a 17lb mainspring with 2 coils removed on my 2 GGI X5 Allrounds. I remove the 2 coils because the Wolff spring would coil bind at its stock length making the end of the trigger stroke a bit stiff as it pushed coils over top each other.

    I ran into the coil bind problem with Wolff recoil springs as well. I run a 14lb Wolff recoil spring and I swapped one out right before a match. All match long my brass was barely coming out of the ejection port and bouncing off my hand. I later discovered that the Wolff spring I had put in the gun before the match had 4 more coils than the one I had replaced. I checked slide travel and found that the longer spring was going to solid coil bind limiting travel to a shorter stroke than with the factory recoil spring. 9mm minor loads don't have enough recoil to compress the stiff secondary spring on the X5 so my slide was going back barely enough to eject the case.

  2. staudacher - Bummer, but thanks for the heads up. Mine's an E2. Actually I'd like to try different grips as I'm finding the E2 a little small for my hands.

    viktorcistic - scroll down on that page further: "Available Weights..............................: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19 Lb."

    If you do change to standard grips you will need a new decocking lever, main spring base and strut. In return you should have a better DA trigger pull.

    You can change to standard grips and just change the decocking lever if you just want to try different grips. Then change out the strut and base later to improve the trigger.

  3. Thanks blaster113. So you're not feeling like factory loads are slamming things around too hard with the 12lb'er eh? I'm still waiting for my spring sets to arrive so I can start testing.

    One thing to keep in mind. The guns equipped with the E2 grips use a different base and strut. It changes the angle on the strut causing some slight binding. You probably will not be able to use as light of a mainspring on an E2 equipped gun as you would a standard gripped P226

  4. Not to barge in on the OP but I am also trying to find a multi caliber setup in 226. My question is I have 7 mecgar 9 mm 18 round mags, will they fit in the classic .22 sig p226?

    yes.

  5. Hello,

    I am interested in purchasing one for my newly acquired P226 X5- Allaround (stainless).

    Thanks for getting back to me with price and how to pay.

    Cheers...

    Eli

    Same here. I'll buy one finally, now that it looks like I can get my extractor fixed.

    Thanks,

    Joe

    Just look me up when you need one.

  6. I know the top ends can be swapped around as long as they are the newer style version. The old stamped west German slides are too tight.

    My main concern is shooting 40 major on the alloy frame of the x5 as they don't sell a .40 cal version.

    SIG at one time offered the X5 Tactical in 40. They had an issue with frames cracking.

    Technically the 40S&W version is still available however you will have to have it imported since SIG US will no longer import them.In Europe the X5 Tactical is called the X5 SO.

    Good luck finding just a slide. Unless you find someone with a junked frame that will sell you their slide you maybe out of luck.

  7. Was curious if i could just pull the sights from my old Sig and drop them in this one?

    yes.

    So next question is will they be at the correct height?

    Sent from my Thrive using tapatalk2

    Maybe.

    If they are off it probably won't be by much.

  8. Here is a sample done in a "stainless" look moly-resin over type III anodizing. I'll have more parts of this nature before long. I'll have thirty parts that will be a ceramic based stainless look coating over an anodized hard coat.

    moly_resin.jpg

  9. It is a STI marked with a SIG logo probably because that is what Max shoots in open.

    Also, in the video did any thing about his X5 look vaguely familiar? :-)

  10. In my experience Gray guns always wants to do "packages" when it comes to modding a Sig. You can save quite a bit of money looking at someone like: http://www.totalautomation.us/

    I only want two minor things done to my X5 and I can save about $300 going with Total Automation.

    ?? Why do you think Grayguns only wants to do packages? That isn't the case.

    Gerry (Total Automation) does nice work as well. Gerry has done work on 3 guns for me.

  11. Thanks Staudacher. I'm sorry to keep asking for this, but I like your part *SO* much I'd like to see it available for non X5s.

    It looks like you'd need to weld on the frame, and then machine it afterwards. Probably not impossible, but not ideal certainly.

    I hope Sig decides to put these rails on everything. What do you think Sig has two different designs in this area? Why not consolidate to a single design?

    Do you know if non-X5 stainless guns (like the USPSA Dual-Tone, or the P226 Stainless / P226ST) have this rail, or are they like the alloy guns? This might be one more reason to push me to get an ST or a USPSA P226.

    -Scott

    I have not seen a ST with a rail.

  12. Here is an example of an X5 frame with the mounting rails.

    X5_frame.jpg

    And here the frame of a P226 produced Feb 2012

    standardframe.jpg

    As you can see you could mill the front part of the rail into the P226 frame but that would provide you with little support at the front of the magwell and only the magwell retention spring for support at the rear. It would probably work ok with the factory magwell but my magwell is designed to provide support for better control of the gun. Therefore the front the magwell will see stress. I would be concerned with the mounting rails of the magwell eventually weakening and breaking due to all the load being concentrated on the front 1/4 of the rail.

×
×
  • Create New...