uscbigdawg Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Of course they did say they didn't need the testimonies of the witnesses either to make a decision either. Don't be surprised with being granted an appeal based on this jury. Rich P.S. My whole argument is based on folks rejoicing over this decision as some kind of vindication of the decision in '95/96. Just remember that if you ever have to go to court if you would prefer a clean slate or a perception of guilt due to something you were acquitted on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Boudrie Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Just remember that if you ever have to go to court if you would prefer a clean slate or a perception of guilt due to something you were acquitted on. Check out some of the court decisions that state the conduct which you have been acquitted of in a previous criminal trial may be considered at sentencing time. Kidnapping and armed robbery are not contry club offenses. Not to mention that "club fed" is just that - a federal prison. OJ was convicted of state charges so the best he can hope for is a less than maximum state prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uscbigdawg Posted October 8, 2008 Share Posted October 8, 2008 Each trial should stand alone, unless a pattern of history (i.e. convictions/behavior) show otherwise. Remember, he did win custody of his children. All I'm saying is a fair trial for everyone, no matter how much we hate them. Rich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now