MLE-ShootingSports Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Not sure if anyone got this letter yet.... I just received a letter from Peter Goloski [MD] that states "Because of the late notice of these changes* the 2005 S&W Winter Championships will be contested under the old rules [Green Book - Effective 5-2-01]. ..." <*changes to rules described as being recently released in prior paragraph> I'd like to say that it is great to see the S&W Winter Championship Match Committee to do the right thing. If you are already signed up, you will see this letter in the mail soon. That is absolutely fantastic. Thank you to S&W! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Round_Gun_Shooter Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 http://www.brianenos.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=20045 When are You shooting Mike?? Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwmagnus Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 S&W obviously had some influence on IDPA and Bill Wilson. Bills response on the IDPA homepage indicates matches held up to mid April will use the old rule book and afterwards the new. More revisions are expected then a final written version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tacted Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 OK, 2 days in the books... Anyone know how it's going up there ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bones Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 Here's some 05WC SSR data: Speedloader shooters finished 2nd (19-2),5th (686-3),6th (GP100 - yes, a Ruger) ,7th (3" 66-5) & 8th (19-5) overall in SSR in the WCs last week - 5 out of the top 8. What a way to send ESR off! Some guy named Miculek took the division. I think he was using a 625. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roundgunner Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 so then why all the fuss and trouble splitting the smallest division in IDPA? was it necessary? Warren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwmagnus Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 so then why all the fuss and trouble splitting the smallest division in IDPA?was it necessary? Warren No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkelly Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 so then why all the fuss and trouble splitting the smallest division in IDPA?---Warren Ahhh, Hmmm, I guess to trim the competitive field for the speedloader guys. Respectfully, jkelly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now