paltik Posted November 5, 2004 Share Posted November 5, 2004 i might join the competition this December and to use a Tanfoglio 9mm for Production category...can you pls share your loading data for Bullseye powder & 125 LRN heads...thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Sweeney Posted November 5, 2004 Share Posted November 5, 2004 I've found 4.2 of Bullseye to be the threshold. You may need more or less, depending on how long and fast your barrel is. But, there may be problems: 9mm can be touchy about crimp, and 9mm with lead even more so. If you over-crimp, accuracy suffers. Crimp as little as you can get away with, and still not have feeding problems. Do not use crimp to prevent bullet set-back, do that with a proper diameter belling stem. 9mm, lead bullets and Bullseye can be a problem accuracy-wise. I have some guns that will tumble lead bullets with Bullseye. Others shoot it fine. The only solution I found (and I tried everything) was to go to a slower powder. By the time I'd moved slower in burn rate to WW-231, the problem went away. If the variables work out for you, the combination can be very accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Posted November 5, 2004 Share Posted November 5, 2004 Patrick wrote: "9mm can be touchy about crimp, and 9mm with lead even more so. If you over-crimp, accuracy suffers. Crimp as little as you can get away with, and still not have feeding problems. Do not use crimp to prevent bullet set-back, do that with a proper diameter belling stem." Excellent reply; all I can add is this: w/ a fast powder like bullseye, you need to test for & prevent set back. Do not bother w/ the so-called "bench test" (pushing the bullet against a bench). Old wives tale that is. Instead, load a dummy round, measure OAL, load it into the Tanfoglio mag & rack the slide HARD. Then eject onto a SOFT surface like a couch & re-measure. More than .05 set back (shorter) & you might consider using a Lee brand U or undersize resizing die (under $20 direct by calling Lee - as in on the telephone; its not on their site). Try LESS bell 1st - could also solve the problem. I would personally go to a 147 (much less perceived recoil than a 124) & switch to inexpensive plated bullets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midvalleyshooter Posted November 5, 2004 Share Posted November 5, 2004 Heres the link to Alliant powder data: http://recipes.alliantpowder.com/rg.taf?_f...etdescr=125%20L Heres more good data: http://www.reloadammo.com/9mloads.htm I have to mostly agree with the suggestions above. I have had good luck with Unique and 147 grain lead bullets. Here are the reasons I like this combo: 1) Its impossible to double charge. A double load of Unique won't fit in a 9mm case. 2)The lighter lead bullets, 125, 115 etc, show poor accuracy and tend to lead barrels when pushed over 1000 fps. 3) I chose the 147 grain lead truncated cone because it only has to go 850 fps to make minor. At this velocity lead bullets leave very little lead making accuracy better and this makes cleaning the barrel easier. YMMV, Keith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midvalleyshooter Posted November 7, 2004 Share Posted November 7, 2004 One more source of data: http://www.handloads.com/loaddata/default....=Powder&Source= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harmon Posted November 10, 2004 Share Posted November 10, 2004 i have found 4.0 grians to be accurate, but its a lil tardy on the PF at 127.. you can get 115s plated rainiers for 33 dollars a thousand, i dont touch plain lead any more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now