Religious Shooter Posted June 1, 2004 Share Posted June 1, 2004 Erik, Hey why'd you go with the Nosler 77's? I see the Nosler 69@.359 is supposed to have the highest BC out of the Hornady 68@.355 and SMK 69@.305. I don't know if it's a typo but the Nosler 77's have a BC of only .340. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErikW Posted June 2, 2004 Share Posted June 2, 2004 I just got some 77s to try and keep for a rainy day... or windy day as the case may be. I'm really suspicious of all the different BCs, especially the big difference between the 69 SMK and Nosler 69. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErikW Posted June 2, 2004 Share Posted June 2, 2004 @#@$%! > Here Nosler says their 69 has a ballistic coefficient of .359. Elsewhere, they say .305. The .359 for the 69 is really fishy right next to the .340 of the 77. And the fact that these are more or less MatchKing clones. And that such a huge difference in BC (.305 to .359) in a .224" diameter, 69gr bullet is @#$%! near impossible. And the fact that the incorrect 69 BC is listed higher than the 77gr BC, despite that it lists a lower sectional density. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now