Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

lneel

Classifieds
  • Posts

    603
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lneel

  1. I am obviously a little biased but....

    SV comes in 4 different sizes (compact not really used for competition), 4 different textures, 3 different trigger guards with 2 different profiles, mag release on either side of the grip and in grip logo options.

    The small (1.25" width) is a little smaller than the old polymer grip and is for folks with small hands.

    The Signature grip is also 1.25" in width with improved ergonomics for a higher grip on the gun.

    The large (1.30" width) is essentially the same size as the old polymer grip.

    If you like options, no questions which one to pick.

    Lee

    Team Infinity shooter/webmaster/GB Quoter/Ammo Loader/whatever'er :-)

  2. Stage 5: The WSB was very clear that targets were to be shot only from within the fault lines. The stage had a double sided set of stairs that led to a very clearly marked fault line area (1x2's painted florescent orange like ALL other fault lines in the match). If you were in the shooting area indicated by the fault lines the target presentation was very tough. If you were standing outside the shooting area the targets were completely and fully visible. As a significant advantage was gained by shooting the 3 targets from the stairs outside the fault lines I issued 6 procedurals. Per rule 3.2.3 I clarified where targets could be engaged on the WSB to attempt to reduce recurrences. As to folks saying the RO's shot it differently and not receiving said procedurals, I was not able to confirm that anyone actually did that.

    Lee,

    Not able to confirm it?

    Greg P. who RO'd on Stage 5 for Squad 33 told you that personally shot from the stairs, and multiple squad members did the same. Roy told you that he watched Dave B. from Squad 33 shoot from the stairs and was present for that Squad discussing if they needed to shoot from the platform or not. Roy was before your ruling, and when Greg told you, your answer was that I was free to take it to arbitration. Duly noted.

    I'm sorry that the first witness, the match RO changed his story, and that you had to make a decision based on dishonest information, but I'd have thought the word of those guys would have been enough for further examination before going to arb.

    I'm curious, with multiple people telling you that Squad 33 had people shoot it differently, including one person who did it himself, and RO'd the squad, what kind of confirmation would have been enough?

    ***EDIT***

    Please don't take it as me being argumentative, it's a legit question. I realize that instead of talking to Ken about the arb (and dragging him into this, which I apologize for) I should have gone to you, so I realize I'm wrong, but with the evidence and witnesses right there, not sure what else could have been done on-site. You were very clear that despite what both people told you they saw and did, that you had made your official decision. Post match I found another member who was part of the discussion and who saw people shoot it that way.....Note I'm not upset, or accusing you or Ken of anything. You guys put on a great match, with a staff that worked extremely hard, and I appreciate it. As I said, I'm just sorry that the match RO changed his story when you asked him, his honesty may have put a different spin on the whole thing.

    I am going to end my discussion of this topic by saying I made a ruling based on the best information I had at the time. There is a clear process for escalation beyond my ruling for which the shooter was offered. Ya'll (you all for non-Texans :-) ) can beat this horse some more but that is it for me. No offense taken, see you guys on the range where I hope we can all do it better next time.

    Lee

  3. It was a good tough match for sure. I shot terrible, but that's on me. Kudos to the staff for sticking it out 4 days in the heat and dust.

    The issue with Stage 5 was there was no rearward fault line closing off the previous shooting area before the stairs, so at a literal reading, the top of the stairs was out-of-bounds and that made little sense. That's where the Thursday confusion came from. I believe the RO's Friday through Sunday ran it consistently the other way. At least they did when I was there.

    Here's a screengrab from a Youtube of somebody that shot from the ropes, with the fault lines highlighted at rear to illustrate the fault-line confusion. Something to keep in mind for stage designers...

    I will agree another rear fault line would have made it more clear, I am sorry with bright florescent orange painted lines that look like ALL the other fault lines in the match were not clear enough. Will do better next time by being more clear, maybe flashing purple LED fault lines.

    Lee

  4. Hands down best match I've attended. Hotter than blazes, but the organizers went above and beyond making sure everyone had access to water. Thanks to all that put this on.

    Just curious...I don't mind moving up in placement, but what happened to the guy I thought had won Single Stack? He is listed on Practiscore and missing on USPSA. Screen caps below.

    John was actually shooting Limited and was moved to the proper division. Practiscore will be updated when it will let me. I guess the new update has a few issues.

    Lee

  5. This match was very fun and EXTREMELY Challenging. I hope everyone enjoyed themselves. Ken, Deron and Lee you gentlemen did an exceptional job. Thank you for hosting this match and rest assured you will always have controversy and naysayers. You have a thankless job that make you easy targets when things don't go the way a competitor likes. You all have my utmost respect and admiration as do all the MDs and RMs for matches I've been to.

    Great seeing everyone (Staff and competitors alike).

    Good seeing you Mark.

    Thanks!

    Lee

  6. Ok, final results have been posted to USPSA. Sorry for the delay but circumstances were beyond my control.

    Thanks to everyone who came out to shoot and also to all the RO/Staff. It was a HUGE match, probably a little too large stage wise but if Ken and I do it again we will certainly make adjustments.

    Also, just to address some of the questions posted in various place I will provide some context from my point of view:

    Stage 12: This was tossed because somehow a steel plate that was available to be shot from the front position of the stage on Thursday/Friday was not available Saturday morning. The hardcover steel and the plate stand were extremely well staked in place (thanks Jeremy) and the footings were in the original locations but somehow it was moved to not present the same view as before so I had to remove it from the match.

    Stage 5: The WSB was very clear that targets were to be shot only from within the fault lines. The stage had a double sided set of stairs that led to a very clearly marked fault line area (1x2's painted florescent orange like ALL other fault lines in the match). If you were in the shooting area indicated by the fault lines the target presentation was very tough. If you were standing outside the shooting area the targets were completely and fully visible. As a significant advantage was gained by shooting the 3 targets from the stairs outside the fault lines I issued 6 procedurals. Per rule 3.2.3 I clarified where targets could be engaged on the WSB to attempt to reduce recurrences. As to folks saying the RO's shot it differently and not receiving said procedurals, I was not able to confirm that anyone actually did that.

    Stage 7: There was a report the WSB from Thursday was different than Saturday. I hate to break it to anyone who thinks that as only 5 copies of the WSB's were brought to the range by the MD and they were all verified to be identical. I believe the issue may be the stage diagram said all mags had to be on the barrel and the WSB just said they could not be on your person. Someone at some point figured out they could place a mag on the chair between their legs and some others didn't and got ticked about it.

    Lastly, I am aware the USPSA website shows me as only CRO. It is incorrect, I am an active certified Range Master. I will ask it be updated again but if anyone doesn't believe it, call the Director of the NROI.

    Even with the controversy that seems to plague every major match lately, I hope everyone at least enjoyed the shooting challenges presented.

    Lee Neel

    TY53799

    2015 USPSA Area 4 Championship Range Master

  7. RO should have offered a reshoot prior to scoring.

    8.6.4 In the event that inadvertent contact from the Range Officer or another external influence has interfered with the competitor during a course of fire, the Range Officer may offer the competitor a reshoot of the course of fire. The competitor must accept or decline the offer prior to seeing either the time or the score from the initial attempt. However, in the event that the competitor commits a safety infraction during any such interference, the provisions of Section 10.3 may still apply.

    It is up to the RO. Though clearly sounds like I would have given him a reshoot in the same situation for sure.

    Lee

  8. As I approach the "back nine" of life, I would love to treat myself to an Infinity. Any way to fondle the different grips? I have yet to see one in the wild although I come across an occasional PT build. I would hate to make a mistake on size or texture on what could be my last gun purchase ever (or at least that is what my wife will be told)

    Brandon can send you some grips to test out with a reasonable deposit. The Infinity Traditional is the same size as a regular plastic grip. The Signature grip is quite unique in the widebody space and the Infinity Competition is a smaller grip for those with small hands.

    Textures are a little harder to describe except the one I like, Micropockets Aggressive is just that, very aggressive. You grab the gun and that is it, no moving around. One would think Micropockets Tactical would be less agressive since the edges are rounded but it is still plenty of grip but doesn't leave you bleeding :-). Regular Micropockets is fair grippy and then you have the SkaterTerrain. It can be had with 60 grit which is pretty much equal to Micropockets Aggressive to 120 grit which is about the same as all other skate board type tape.

    If those descriptions don't explain it all give Brandon a call and he can get you some samples.

    Lee

  9. The current estimated delivery time frame is 12-15 months. Brandon is working hard (6+ days a week) to lower this but time flies once you put a deposit down!


    I try to respond to all Gunbuilder's submitted within 8 hours. I am also always available to help anyone walk through the options. Most options have pics by clicking the option name.


    Lee

  10. I used E3 extensively when Nic and I were shooting Limited. 4.5gr with a 180gr MG JHP and 4.3gr with Precision 185gr Moly's. Worked great and was very clean at those pressures.

    Lee

  11. MSA Sordin Supreme Pro X, water resistant, 5 year warranty. Yes, they are very expensive but worth every dollar. My first set lasted 7 years before I replaced them without hesitation with a fresh pair.

    http://srstactical.com/all-products/headsets-and-hearing-protection/msa-sordin-supreme-range/msa-sordin-supreme-pro-x-black-special.html

    Don't waste your time trying to find a $100 pair that is equal to these. Believe me, I have tried almost all of them and they don't compare.

    Lee

  12. Nitrohuck> I hope you realize that the SVI Grips are not "Drop In" fit to STI frames. Machining is needed to make an SVI Steel Grip to fit onto an STI Frame. I hope you have a knowledgeable gunsmith close by that can fit it correctly.

    Actually we make an STI specific model. STI keyways are much more varied from frame to frame and it is best to measure yours and provide us the info when ordering. We can manufacture an exact fit.

    Lee

  13. Stick with either of the tried and true options that are out there.

    http://www.infinityfirearms.com

    http://www.ptrinity.com

    Both have GOOD reputations in the industry.

    OP asks opinion of product, if anyone saw it first hand.. You say they are junk, without any actual reason or evidence.. Real helpful.

    I agree. Infinity grips are what, around $800? PT grips are OK but why can't there be other good products out there. Matt Cheely is the C in CK and they don't come any better than him.

    Our grips potentially cost more due to the number of options available. Sizes, textures, cutouts, multiple trigger guard options, logo recesses, etc. Similarly configured, ours are available for about the same pricing. Our advantage is time in the market. We certainly have had time to work out the bugs. Some others, not so much. I am not saying they aren't good, I can just say from 7 years of experience they will have bumps in the road.

    Lee

  14. I think generally people swap the infinity trigger onto an STI bow. That's the way I have heard people talk about doing it.

    You could also look at the STI "gunsmith blank" triggers. Its an extremely long, flat, polymer trigger. I use one cut back just a bit as I have fairly long fingers as well.

    No, we make a bow shaped for the polymer grips and another for our metal grips. Just specify when ordering on our site. Fitting to other metal grips probably would require some modification but should be too much.

    Lee

×
×
  • Create New...