Swarovski ruggedness?

[Alaskapopo]

On 5/24/2017 at 6:38 AM, waxman said:

What i don't understand is on the kahles,  and swaro, none of the reticle subtensions line up with .223 balistics. The razor jm seems much better  for this.What am I missing?

They are in mills which I prefer much over a BDC. 

[Alaskapopo]

On 5/25/2017 at 1:42 PM, waxman said:

I agree, with this statement,  but at such weird distances. Doesn't it make more sense to know where your rifle hits at 1,2,3,4,5, and 600 yards?Isn't the swaro, something like 286, 419,670, or some other weird  distances?

Depends on your load and how you zero. With a 175 yard zero mine is 175 300 then 400. Which is where I stopped not having a range past 400 yards. 

[DeauxJoe]

I too have the Razor and The 1-6 Z6i. The Z6 is on a light weight build for my wife. It's a ton lighter and slightly better glass quality. I just head out till a used Z6 crossed my path and bought it. 

[1chota]

On ‎5‎/‎25‎/‎2017 at 3:42 PM, waxman said:

I agree, with this statement,  but at such weird distances. Doesn't it make more sense to know where your rifle hits at 1,2,3,4,5, and 600 yards?Isn't the swaro, something like 286, 419,670, or some other weird  distances?

with 223 it depends on which weight bullet you use.  69grainers and a 300 yard zero match with my BRT.

in 308 the same with 135grainers.

300 yd. zero is only 4.5 " high at 100, dead on at 50.