I've given this a bit more thought, and have done a lot more research into the holster/belt/mag decision.
I'm pretty much leaning to a belt-holster. Due to input on paddle holsters riding higher, and in some cases, not being secure. Since this is just a 'gaming' holster, SOB holsters are out, and IWB seem too likely to be uncomfortable.
I'm also seriously considering Kydex as an option, there appear to be some well engineered stuff out there, with may proponents. Leather, to this newbie, just seems like it would be higher 'quality', or perhaps I'm an anti-plastic-bigot. But I could believe that kydex would help on the draw.
What causes less wear? Leather or Kydex. I mean I realize that my 1911s are my tools, and on an old rifle, actually appreciate a touch of wear and tear. (I know that dirt is the big enemy.) I had considered holster use getting my 1911s, and although I prefer a blue 1911, I have a stainless and a hard chrome 1911. I don't know if these will survive unscathed.
I appreciate the input I've gotten...(here and on another board).
I'm drifting towards the following options.
Leather:
- Dillon 'Master' holster/Dillon 1.5" double thick belt/Dual leather mag holders.
- Milt Sparks CC-AT Holster/Milt Sparks Belt (geezzz$80?)/leather mag holders
Kydex:
- Comp-Tac Belt holstet/Wilderness 1.5" belt/plastic-kydex mag holders
- SideArmor Modular Belt Holster/Wilderness 1.5" belt/plastic-kydex mag holders
I'm figuring that if they are IDPA approved, it opens up other options, and can be used in IPSC too.
Also, I did see 1911 Govt' holsters that said: * - Will not fit Springfield
...and both of my 1911s have Springfield frames.
More advice is always appreciated!