Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

11287

Classified
  • Posts

    149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 11287

  1. Looks like the squeaky wheel just got oiled.  I pays to be persistent.  I got an email this morning for my tracking number for a new SRO.  If it arrives within a week it will be about a 7 week turnaround.  I guess that beats 23 weeks.

  2. One of the problems is the plate I had to purchase for the SRO hole pattern.  It's the one from Cajun for around $95 plus shipping.  If I go with something else, I get to buy another plate.  I have been shooting limited the past few matches.  My limited gun is a SVI sight tracker, so its not like I have nothing else that's decent to shoot.

  3. If it does take 23 weeks as was stated, they will have had it longer than me.  I have sent out 2 more emails asking for any updates on new stock becoming available.  No replies to either email.  Not real happy with Trijicon at this point.  I would think a SRO would last more than 500 rounds on a CZ Shadow 2.  Thinking about trying the
    DeltaPoint but I read they have problems too.  But maybe their warranty turnaround is faster, LOL.

  4. I purchased a 2.5 SRO in early Spring.  I put it on a CZ Shadow 2 optic ready and shot a handful of practice sessions on one match.  I get it out shoot a match and can't get the dot to brighten up, its extremely dim.  I contacted Trijicon and they sent RMA and I sent the sight in.  After about a mount with no word, I emailed them.  Within 20 min I get a response that they are replacing the sight and I will get a tracking number.  After about a week with no tracking, I send another email.  No response.  I then send another a couple days later.

     

    They responded that they submitted my info for replacement on June 24th but they do not have any available.  Usual estimated time for replacement can be 2-4 weeks

    but as they stated, It could be up to 23 weeks.  Does this sound right.  Have others experienced this much of a time delay.  I live in N. Idaho with a 6 month shooting season and have already lost out on 4 matches in Carry Optics.  I have owned 5 other Trijicon product and have never had to use the warranty.  Is this the norm?

     

    Rant over, thanks

  5. I used the CH plate with the dovetail cut in the rear.  I just leave it blank.  Or, you can use the CH P10 plate.  Its just a plate, no dovetail.  I run the 11.5 Cajun hammer spring and 11 recoil spring, I just left the factory buffer in place and have had no problems.  I used the Cajun Gun Works short reach trigger kit and I think that one comes with a T6 disco.  I think Dave said the T5 is used if you do not get the short reach kit.  Either way the disco was straight drop in for me but I've had it go the other way on another pistol where I need to remove a little material from the disco.  The disco and trigger reach kit made a world of difference for me.

    IMG_2705.jpg

  6. The one for $95 allows you to install a rear sight behind the optic if you want.  At the chpws website, they sell the one you have posted and you can also use their P10 plate, with not provisions for rear sight.  It is less money.  I can say it is a solid mounting plate

     

    IMG_2705.jpg

  7. Compared to the cost of the Cajun kits I've installed the Eemann prices are very reasonable for their Upgrade Kit.  That's kind of throwing me, why is it so cheap.  Just wish there were some reviews online.  Their thumb rest looks nice.  I run a thumb rest on my limited gun SVI and I like it.  If I order the Eemann Kit I might included the thumb rest.

  8. Does anyone have any experience with the Eemann Tech products.  Specifically the Upgrade Kit for the Shadow 2.  I have installed several Cajun Gun Works Pro kits on various CZs I own.  I cannot find any first hand reviews of the Eemann Upgrade kit.  Only a handful of videos on Youtube that deal with disco installs.

  9. 2 hours ago, FALAR said:

     

     

    Are those CZC you're running in .40 or 9mm?

     

    I notice on the CZC site they say that in 9mm their basepads don't add capacity due to magazine ribs.

    My 9mm mags with CZC basepads, CZC springs and followers gets me 23 rounds.  29 on the 170 mags

  10. George, I did it myself.  I borrowed the reamer from a friend.  Had to buy a handle and cutting fluid.  I just went slow until I got to the depth I wanted.  It only takes a couple turns by hand to get the desired depth.  If I had to buy the reamer too, it might have been cheaper to take it to a gunsmith.  My Czechmate came with two barrel, so did both of them and my CZ SP-01 as well.

  11. Loaded the first 100 of the RMR 124 JHP.  I had to shorten my OAL to 1.145 for a successful plunk test in my Czechmate (reamed barrel).  That is down from the 1.160 using Precision Delta 124 JHP.  I used 7.9 gr of HS6 to get the PD's to 170 PF.  I had to scale down to 7.7 gr of HS6 with the RMR bullet to hit the same 170 PF

  12. 1 hour ago, Truckin_Thumper said:

    So, the CZ runs great, but had one issue with my big stick, chalked it up to one too many rounds in it. 

    Seriously, have Bevin Gram tune your mags and use his springs and followers in the 170mm mags.  When he tuned mine a few years ago, he told me if I forced it, I could probably fit 30 in the tube, but he told me not to do it and stick with 29.  Mine are reloadable with 29 if I ever had to do it.  I have never had any problems with my mags or feeding issues once Bevin tuned the mags.  Just saying!!!!!

     

×
×
  • Create New...