Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Skroggster

Classified
  • Posts

    136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Skroggster

  1. After 4 days at the Range, One hell of a match & AWESOME Competitors whom I had a blast with for two of these 4 days! I have 2 words for ya'll TWICE! THANK YOU & GOOD NIGHT!
  2. http://www.uspsa.org/uspsa-display-match-results-detail.php?indx=3175 Take 3 for Bartlo! He wins!
  3. DO OVER #1 http://www.uspsa.org/uspsa-display-match-results-detail.php?indx=3174 Place Name No Class Division Lady Mil Law For Age Match Points % A Class 1 Bartolo, Chris 150 A Single Stack No No No No 1015.3313 100.00% 2 West, Barry 30 A Single Stack No No No No 885.8955 87.25% 3 Carroll, Kevin 51 A Single Stack No No No No 853.2190 84.03% 4 Gilson, Christopher 40 A Single Stack No No No No 841.6962 82.90%
  4. This should make you happy! You won A division. Sorry for the mistake. The Girls helping me did a phenomenal job. Place Name No Class Division Lady Mil Law For Age Match Points % A Class 1 Bartolo, Chris 150 A Single Stack No No No No 1015.3313 100.00% 2 West, Barry 30 A Single Stack No No No No 885.8955 87.25% 3 Carroll, Kevin 51 A Single Stack No No No No 853.2190 84.03% 4 Gilson, Christopher 40 A Single Stack No No No No 841.6962 82.90%
  5. Well this will make you happy! You won A Division! - Sorry for the mistake! http://www.uspsa.org/uspsa-display-match-results-detail.php?indx=3174
  6. Your Scores are posted! http://www.uspsa.org/uspsa-display-match-results-detail.php?indx=3172 2011 Indiana State SS-Prod-Rev Match Match Date: 10/29/2011 Place Name No Class Division Lady Mil Law For Age Match Points % A Class 1 Gallaway, Richard 122 A Production No No No No 1001.3464 100.00% 2 Armbrust, Mike 156 A Production No No No No 988.8784 98.75% 3 Nellessen, Ross 113 A Production No No No No 950.9267 94.96% 4 Black, Jared 100 A Production No No No No 934.3958 93.31% 5 Martens, Jake 11 A Production No No No No 879.6878 87.85% 6 Carter, Daniel 132 A Production No No No No 829.2237 82.81% 7 llasos, Teddy 72 A Production No No No No Senior 741.1993 74.02% DQed Whitaker, Jeff 148 A Production No No No No 0.0000 0.00% DQed Whitaker, Jeff Production 0.0000 0.00% B Class 1 Pignato, Anthony 147 B Production No No No No 1008.0134 100.00% 2 Palmer, Ross 119 B Production No No No No 920.5652 91.32% 3 McAdams, Jacob 160 B Production No No No No 912.2049 90.50% 4 Decker, Matthew 115 B Production No No No No 901.8249 89.47% 5 Etchison, Lon 111 B Production No No No No 890.9198 88.38% 6 Borke, Fritz 27 B Production No No No No 870.3152 86.34% 7 Bies, Nick 60 B Production No No No No 850.7241 84.40% 8 Wurm, James 123 B Production No No No No 836.5727 82.99% 9 Steele, Nathan 50 B Production No No No No 834.2345 82.76% 10 Perez, Roland 94 B Production No No No No 830.3133 82.37% 11 Hershey, Bryan 49 B Production No No No No 829.6402 82.30% 12 Davidson, Brad 145 B Production No No No No 823.5691 81.70% 13 VanDenberg, Sean 59 B Production No No No No 813.0215 80.66% 14 Carlson, Carrie 56 B Production Yes No No No 805.3505 79.89% 15 Bright, Aron 12 B Production No No No No 793.8253 78.75% 16 Soonpaa, Mark 143 B Production No No No No 763.8574 75.78% 17 Murphy, John 97 B Production No No No No Senior 727.4374 72.17% 18 Brantley, Thomas 86 B Production No No No No 691.3143 68.58% 19 Trout, Rhianna 105 B Production Yes No No No 671.2162 66.59% 20 Thompson, Mike 140 B Production No No No No Senior 671.0886 66.58% 21 Stowers, Jeff 17 B Production No No No No 669.1997 66.39% 22 Griggs, Phil 112 B Production No No No No 605.4354 60.06% 23 Click, Dan 162 B Production No No No No 605.1910 60.04% 23 Click, Dan Production 605.1910 60.04% C Class 1 Hart, Daniel 1 C Production No No No No 860.1499 100.00% 2 Sauline, Mark 48 C Production No No No No 852.4153 99.10% 3 Lopez, Ralph 136 C Production No No No No 848.1786 98.61% 4 Fuesz, Matthew 89 C Production No No No No 824.4477 95.85% 5 Timmerman, Nicholas 178 C Production No No No No 770.6502 89.59% 6 Knight, Matt 33 C Production No No No No 762.0474 88.59% 7 Barrera, Michael 80 C Production No No No No 746.7653 86.82% 8 Smith, Steven 70 C Production No No No No 746.3880 86.77% 9 Simmons, Robert 77 C Production No No No No 727.6146 84.59% 10 Nash, Gary 172 C Production No No No No 703.5598 81.80% 11 Reich, Todd 125 C Production No No No No 698.3450 81.19% 12 Anderson, Byron 101 C Production No No No No 676.7509 78.68% 13 Pronoble, Jamie 71 C Production No No No No Senior 663.0517 77.09% 14 Bohney, Steve 96 C Production No No No No 650.9367 75.68% 15 Crispin, Gary 24 C Production No No No No 648.3015 75.37% 16 Wright, Kevin 177 C Production No No No No 638.0058 74.17% 17 Jaynes, Chris 161 C Production No No No No 636.1310 73.96% 18 Evans, Eric 79 C Production No No No No 590.9004 68.70% 19 Scarberry, Justin 64 C Production No No No No 590.0882 68.60% 20 Toth, Jake 171 C Production No No No No 584.9461 68.01% 21 Schwenn, Tom 120 C Production No No No No Super Senior 578.7208 67.28% 22 Merrill, James 85 C Production No No No No 563.1398 65.47% 23 Kimball, John 169 C Production No No No No Super Senior 521.7025 60.65% 24 Nash, Tess 173 C Production No No No No 453.0929 52.68% 25 McCauley, Mike 7 C Production No No No No 311.7610 36.24% DQed Radala, Craig 121 C Production No No No No 0.0000 0.00% DQed Radala, Craig Production 0.0000 0.00% D Class 1 Cary, Craig 52 D Production No No No No 647.7686 100.00% 2 Whitaker, Justin 54 D Production No No No No 640.3592 98.86% 3 Deaner, Matthew 20 D Production No No No No 623.2048 96.21% 4 Oakes, Jeff 138 D Production No No No No 504.3432 77.86% 5 McNelly, Dusten 37 D Production No No No No 482.1728 74.44% 6 Mortier, Noel 66 D Production No No No No Super Senior 455.5733 70.33% 7 Ireland, Dan 61 D Production No No No No Super Senior 432.1031 66.71% 8 Lawyer, Tiffany 18 D Production Yes No No No 428.4069 66.14% 9 Dalton, John 10 D Production No No No No Super Senior 403.6651 62.32% 10 Sears, Chris 128 D Production No No No No 384.2802 59.32% 10 Sears, Chris Production 384.2802 59.32% GM Class 1 Farris, Kyle 153 GM Production No No No No 1102.5309 100.00% 1 Farris, Kyle Production 1102.5309 100.00% M Class 1 Hawkins, Tony 168 M Production No No No No 1104.7391 100.00% 2 Panzl, Greg 81 M Production No No No No 969.2700 87.74% 3 Bedwell, Max 93 M Production No No No No Super Senior 870.1585 78.77% 4 Anderson, Steve 152 M Production No No No No 856.9087 77.57% 4 Anderson, Steve Production 856.9087 77.57% Unclassified 1 Vaughn, Colin 55 U Production No No No No 830.7819 100.00% 2 Fearnow, Jake 124 U Production No No No No 742.1657 89.33% 3 Turner, Joshua 117 U Production No No No No 658.9867 79.32% 4 Cochran, Jonathan 179 U Production No No No No Junior 600.5814 72.29% 5 Nelson, Andrew 135 U Production No No No No 567.1729 68.27% 6 Leffler, Randy 58 U Production No No No No 534.7804 64.37% 7 Schultz, Dale 165 U Production No No No No Super Senior 464.3166 55.89% 8 McNelly, Sylvia 38 U Production Yes No No No 353.6756 42.57% 9 McDonnell, John 83 U Production No No No No 297.8788 35.86% DQed Dean, Gary 159 U Production No No No No 0.0000 0.00% Total Number of Competitors: 82 Match Date: 10/29/2011 Place Name No Class Division Lady Mil Law For Age Match Points % A Class 1 Bartolo, Chris 150 A Single Stack No No No No 981.4597 100.00% 2 West, Barry 30 A Single Stack No No No No 885.8955 90.26% 3 Carroll, Kevin 51 A Single Stack No No No No 853.2190 86.93% 4 Gilson, Christopher 40 A Single Stack No No No No 841.6962 85.76% 4 Gilson, Christopher Single Stack 841.6962 85.76% B Class 1 Stiner, Ryan 73 B Single Stack No No No No 969.2240 100.00% 2 Lee, David 127 B Single Stack No No No No 956.2953 98.67% 3 Gates, Ken 103 B Single Stack No No No No 955.2380 98.56% 4 Blackwell, John 114 B Single Stack No No No No 933.6390 96.33% 5 Timmer, Jarrod 47 B Single Stack No No No No 928.2962 95.78% 6 Christensen, Jason 130 B Single Stack No No No No 909.5507 93.84% 7 Dengler, Cody 118 B Single Stack No No No No 901.3800 93.00% 8 Huening, Kyle 84 B Single Stack No No No No 883.4419 91.15% 9 Serafin, John 133 B Single Stack No No No No 864.7101 89.22% 10 Dezarn, Bill 25 B Single Stack No No No No Senior 805.4012 83.10% 11 Griggs, Eric 167 B Single Stack No No No No 801.5238 82.70% 12 Bing, Jeff 45 B Single Stack No No No No 777.2802 80.20% 13 Coomer, Darrell 99 B Single Stack No No No No 753.7548 77.77% 14 James, Mark 129 B Single Stack No No No No 749.4161 77.32% 15 Cleminshaw, J.D. 44 B Single Stack No No No No 746.0481 76.97% 16 Ford, Gavin 16 B Single Stack No No No No 678.3793 69.99% 16 Ford, Gavin Single Stack 678.3793 69.99% C Class 1 Bostick, Chris 107 C Single Stack No No No No 795.2414 100.00% 2 Harder, Kevin 141 C Single Stack No No No No 794.0759 99.85% 3 Siegrist, Cory 108 C Single Stack No No No No 783.2011 98.49% 4 Kifer, Jeremy 75 C Single Stack No No No No 776.3389 97.62% 5 Stiner, James 74 C Single Stack No No No No 739.8700 93.04% 6 Broughton, Jason 57 C Single Stack No No No No 739.7988 93.03% 7 Cohee, Phil 139 C Single Stack No No No No 734.7688 92.40% 8 Bell, Jody 53 C Single Stack No No No No 729.5299 91.74% 9 Cooper, Ron 62 C Single Stack No No No No Senior 727.2163 91.45% 10 Buchnat, Ron 29 C Single Stack No No No No Super Senior 720.3156 90.58% 11 Chada, Shannon 46 C Single Stack Yes No No No 712.2894 89.57% 12 Patton, Robert 90 C Single Stack No No No No 684.3040 86.05% 13 Metcalf, Scott 23 C Single Stack No No No No 670.9935 84.38% 14 Crichfield, Steve 22 C Single Stack No No No No 669.0996 84.14% 15 Calderisi, Michael 149 C Single Stack No No No No 666.4221 83.80% 16 Katt, Mark 41 C Single Stack No No No No Senior 661.0660 83.13% 17 McCauley, Jeff 13 C Single Stack No No No No 658.6076 82.82% 18 Frame, Burl 6 C Single Stack No No No No 650.0040 81.74% 19 Linder, Patrick 87 C Single Stack No No No No 648.6954 81.57% 20 Reilly, Joe 26 C Single Stack No No No No 615.8858 77.45% 21 Scheuerle, John 39 C Single Stack No No No No 609.4473 76.64% 22 Shattel, David 106 C Single Stack No No No No Senior 555.0708 69.80% 23 Cooper, Mary Ann 63 C Single Stack Yes No No No 536.4079 67.45% 24 Ford, Chris 15 C Single Stack No No No No 534.9754 67.27% 25 Trautmann, John 43 C Single Stack No No No No Super Senior 526.8804 66.25% 26 Carmichael, Chops 68 C Single Stack No No No No 470.2925 59.14% 27 Mahon, Chuck 170 C Single Stack No No No No 453.1460 56.98% 28 Siegers, Rick 42 C Single Stack No No No No Senior 386.5466 48.61% DQed Emmerson, Dave 65 C Single Stack No No No No 0.0000 0.00% DQed Emmerson, Dave Single Stack 0.0000 0.00% D Class 1 Spaitis, Joe 82 D Single Stack No No No No 615.5731 100.00% 2 Shirar, Justin 3 D Single Stack No No No No 597.3512 97.04% 3 Downham, Jesse 176 D Single Stack No No No No 499.1061 81.08% 4 Easton, Don 88 D Single Stack No No No No 458.4361 74.47% 5 Buchholz, Irvin 67 D Single Stack No No No No Senior 339.1643 55.10% DQed Strauch, Jeff 4 D Single Stack No No No No 0.0000 0.00% DQed Szczygiel, Jason 163 D Single Stack No No No No 0.0000 0.00% DQed Butler, Roger 151 D Single Stack No No No No Senior 0.0000 0.00% DQed Butler, Roger Single Stack 0.0000 0.00% GM Class 1 Estill, Corey 146 GM Single Stack No No No No 1040.1138 100.00% 1 Estill, Corey Single Stack 1040.1138 100.00% M Class 1 Trout, Mathew 104 M Single Stack No No No No 1108.0826 100.00% 2 Foley, Michael 32 M Single Stack No No No No 1001.4887 90.38% 2 Foley, Michael Single Stack 1001.4887 90.38% Unclassified 1 Marthey, Chad 95 U Single Stack No No No No 873.6395 100.00% 2 Paegel, Walt 134 U Single Stack No No No No 762.0474 87.23% 3 Chaney, Gary 102 U Single Stack No No No No 584.0352 66.85% 4 Wessler, Michael 36 U Single Stack No No No No 480.8756 55.04% 5 Hickman, Horace 8 U Single Stack No No No No Super Senior 474.9682 54.37% 6 Carrol, Mike 144 U Single Stack No No No No 402.5917 46.08% 7 Mogle, Sue 131 U Single Stack Yes No No No 356.7936 40.84% Total Number of Competitors: 68 Place Name No Class Division Lady Mil Law For Age Match Points % A Class 1 Fish, Scott 78 A Revolver No No No No 1024.5056 100.00% 2 Briggs, RePete 92 A Revolver No No No No 731.3721 71.39% 2 Briggs, RePete Revolver 731.3721 71.39% B Class 1 Roberts, Brent 14 B Revolver No No No No 1066.6302 100.00% 2 Savard, John 109 B Revolver No No No No 1021.0645 95.73% 2 Savard, John Revolver 1021.0645 95.73% C Class 1 Allen, Corey 126 C Revolver No No No No 942.0302 100.00% DQed Woodard, Danny 116 C Revolver No No No No 0.0000 0.00% DQed Woodard, Danny Revolver 0.0000 0.00% M Class 1 Rausch, Chad 154 M Revolver No No No No 1138.0014 100.00% 1 Rausch, Chad Revolver 1138.0014 100.00% Unclassified 1 Conrad, Jason 174 U Revolver No No No No 760.9019 100.00% 2 Blackwell, Jeremy 155 U Revolver No No No No 746.6982 98.13% Total Number of Competitors: 9
  7. Big +1 on that. And to think these guys ran it back to back with the regularly scheduled match last weekend....Just an outstanding effort from the ACC crew putting it on. They put in a ton of work on this match. Kudos, mega-kudos to them. You too Rob! You were a tremendoust help. All staff were! I would work with this staff at any level match anywhere anytime!
  8. Matt! Irregardless, with photos like that, you don't have to shoot good but just look good! Can I use those photos for next years match?
  9. By the way, toe down is for all thie Indiana redneck jokes I heard today! Just keeping it real!
  10. We just got the range toe down. Loaded up band headed to Beverly! Need to get my valuables unloaded, in the house, spend a bit with my 6 yo Angel and then Ill re-run all scoring to show I really won! (Kidding) I will get scores up at USPSA.ORG before midnight EST! THANK YOU COMPETITORS for making this a success! I had a BLAST today talking with everyone! You/we/committment/DVC IS WHY WE DO THIS! Bart Farmer
  11. Yes, But for you it's a 100$! You have been a procrastinator since state! See how you are! Geez! Hope to see you Sunday! Bart
  12. Well, we are 2 days away from Mongo and I's first LII match. We started late in advertisement. (We have 161 registered of the "wanted" 200") Not bad for our rookie year! WE are expecting walk ins as the emails and phone calls have been flowimg for last minute plans!!!! Mongo was focused on the Match, and I focused on registration. I inquired about sponsorship LATE in the game! After a few Millet Lite, I said Fug It, started blowing up vendor emails. Daniel and Jake had some strings and pulled in 5 Pistols. Hoorah to that. We have aquired several other sponsors which we are thankful for and have some nice smaller give aways for staff and compeititors. We need to Thank Springfield Armory - http://springfield-armory.com/ Ron & Mary Ann Cooper at Target Sports - Sheridan Indiana Montana Gold - http://www.montanagoldbullet.c​om/ Brownells -www.brownells.com Houge Grips - www.getgrip.com Barsto - Precision www.barsto.com Shooters Connection - www.shootersconnection.com Ford Shooters (Gavin & Chris) www.fordshooters.com Chris's Winning Shooting Accesories - http://cpwsa.com/ We look forward to hosting this match as our Rookie Season in L2 and Springfield Armory springfield-armory.com
  13. We will register all day Saturday for Sunday Shooters. We will have myself and Chris in there doing stats and Registration amomg shooting. If there is no one there at the moment there will be shortly come on in, look over the stages. Watch the Staff and Competitors shoot. Look forward to seeing you there!! Bart
  14. 230 MB may be a lot for some to download. Oh well. I have delegated this to you next weekend. I am quitting!
  15. OK, THERE HAS BEEN A FEW STAGE CHANGES. FOR THOSE WHO NEED A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE HERE THEY ARE.
  16. I was wondering the same thing! I have only recieved 1 sponsorship package besides the firearms already announced. We will depending on what your vendors provide divide our prizes among the table and staff. We were not going to seek sponsorship this year, but I got a hair and said lets market. These Items may not be firearms but are useful to the range. Next years marketing will be more intense and more profitable to all you fellow competitors!
  17. I would like to also note that we have added 4 more sponsors to this match. Brownells Hogue Grips Montana Gold Bullets http://www.cpwsa . com is aboard now too.
  18. An issue with me? It's your match do it how you like I just wanted to know how they were going. That wasn't meant to be a crass statement Sir. I was curious that if there was nothing to win of a tangible other than a wood plaque if it would still be of interest to a shooter of your caliber.
×
×
  • Create New...