Not sure what the unspoken assumptions are or how you got to that conclusion.
The purpose of the new division seems to be to encourage innovation of handguns with optical sights.
We already have had a division doing that for 20 years. It's called Open.
The logical distinctions between the divisions that we have, other than Limited 10, are pretty straight forward, and even L10 has a historical, albeit obsolete, rationale.
But I know of no example in our history where we've tried to create a division in order to create an arms race rather than to eliminate one or to try to add competitive equity.
What are we alleviating? A few people won't have to buy magazine extensions for their G17s with an optic? Is that the kind of arms race that justified the creation of a new division?
In a word yes. So maybe I misunderstand the arms race. No mag extensions, no mag well, no slide racker , no comp, etc. seems like arms race in reverse.
I like what you said about innovation. The innovation of red dots is trickling down into other areas. Much like anti-lock brakes coming from Formula 1 racing into your Buick. But one wouldn't mistake a Buick for a Ferrari much like a G19 with an RMR isn't an open race gun.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk