BL9778

I am not an expert chemist, or waterologist..........but,............ I have an acquaintance who designed a water purification methodology and has made a lot of money out of the hardware he sell's. To design the method and put together the components he had to learn about water......which was a learning curve as he was an Air Force aircraft spanner monkey. Anyway: He asked me if I would like a seat on one of his user courses - always willing to learn something I attended. The system he builds and sell's produces water which has it's contaminant level measured in parts per billion - this is a step further than the original systems where the contamination was measured in parts per million. Moving on: The cleaner water is the more it looks for 'dirt' to stabilise itself. If you look at ultrapure water under a super-microscope it will look like boiling nitric acid trying to burn through water is holding it. Dirt/contamination settles it down. Pure water will attract dirt. So to answer you original question: Invest in a super water purification system and you will not need detergent. The closest you will get to a system like my acquaintance produces is a fish tank water purification system unless you want to spend around $20K.

Hi folks. I have been stopping by and reading every so often, usually when I have a Dillon problem. I thought it was time to be a bit more active and scribble a few words now and then. I am a long time shooter. Started out with air rifle target shooting, progressed to .22 target and then leapt into doing some IPSC about 30 years ago to polish my technique for my chosen career of soldiering. You get older, the eye's give out, everything goes south, and only then do you start to have some "me time". So now I pootle around and shoot for my own enjoyment and pleasure, and then give myself some pain by testing myself every so often at Bill Rogers place. Looking forward to it.