Here is his reply. Not really saying what the call is exactly but letting me know that I need to be prepared to defend it better in the future possibly. Logically it drives me a little batty as you may not even be able to put it on safe in DA but if for some reason it does it needs to work as a safety even though it was never intended to be used that way. It doesn't matter if the safety works perfectly in SA. What advantage do I get if the safety can go up in DA? If anything it's a disadvantage.
Anyway, on to the email:
The question was not whether it could be put in safe in any variety of positions, it was whether the gun had been modified to allow that. Having only Matt Hopkins from CZ as a reference, and his statement that this was not the way the gun was supposed to function, the gun was deemed unsafe. We don't usually have the time to research this kind of thing at a match, nor are we all expected to be experts on every gun out there. And, the onus for demonstrating that a gun is safe to operate is always on the competitor--the one with the gun in his hand. I understand trigger work,etc., may lead to this kind of situation, but in many people's minds, this will be an altered, and therefore unsafe, gun.
I may look into this further, but if I were you, I'd be prepared to have that questioned at any match where the chronograph officer is checking, as he should be.
Regards,
Troy