Neil,
Sorry mate, back to the subject.
The way I was thinking of the risk assessment, is to give
it to the people building the stages and setting targetry.
They assess the stages and the overall range complex themselves.
The info is then given to the reviewer before the on-site review.
In this way any problems that may arise because of simple mistakes
can be rectified during the build stage, because hopefully, they will
not submit an out of spec assessment.
When the reviewer checks the assessment, any problems that may
arise, but have been assessed as satisfactory by the builders, may be
looked into in more detail by the reviewer.
It should mean that if you have a tight schedule for review, only
differences of opinon may need to be looked at.
It's just an idea, and would be very helpful to new venues.
The old way of calulating the risk may work.
Steve