Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

oldcurmudgeon

Members
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by oldcurmudgeon

  1. I want to get a modified choke tube for my Winchester SX2, but don't want to order the wrong thing. I see Cabela's lists tubes for "Winchester/Weatherby/Mossberg." Are these the same or is the SX2 something special?>

    (I searched the forums, but didn't find an answer)

    Thanks

  2. I have a 25' travel trailer that I pull with my 3/4 ton Suburban. I used to have a half-ton with a higher rear end and it just doesn't cut it in the mountains.

    Just about everything in life is a trade off.

    Last year I took our trailer to the Area 1 match near Puyallup, Wash., the Idaho Glock Championship and a couple of matches at Albany, Oregon. Except for Idaho, I was able to park on the range. My 25-gallon fresh-water tank and 40-gallon wastewater tanks were more than adequate. I have a Honda generator so power is never a problem. (My idea of roughing it these days is having to use the generator to power the satellite TV receiver.)

    The best part was the camaraderie at the Area 1 match at the Paul Bunyan club in Puyallup. I met a great bunch of new friends.

    My wife and I drove from Oregon to Phoenix for the Río Salado Area 2 match and did NOT pull the trailer (we're retired so time isn't an issue). I think we saved money by staying in motels, but I'm not sure. RV parks aren't cheap these days, although you can spend the night in the parking lot of most, but not all, Wal-Marts while on the road.

    Comfort and cost increase with size. Mobility and gas mileage of the tow vehicle decrease as the size of the RV increases. The larger the vehicle, the more attention you have to pay to such details as changing lanes on the highway, access to fuel pumps, campground spaces and going down roads where there's no place at the end to turn around.

    Motor homes, unless you pull a vehicle or have a mobile friend, are a problem since you cannot easily move to go the store, match stages, etc. Truck-mounted campers have the same problem.

    I wouldn't purchase a trailer just for matches, but ours is used for other purposes as well.

    Good luck

  3. We've got a couple clubs in the section now that are paying for setup and teardown. The MD was giving a disocunt of X amount of dollars to folks to come setup. He figured that instead of giving that out he could just pay a couple folks to come out and set up and tear down. It costs an extra dollar or two per shooter but there is a ton less burnout, no one has to stick around for teardown and the match, and this is the weird part for one particular club, actually starts on time.

    When this method is followed, every shooter contributes equally to setup and tear down and there's no problem with helpers and non-helpers.

    Moreover, it allows those of us who are still super-seniors after 1 January to contribute equally to the task.

  4. This rule deals with large, ragged, non-round bullet hits caused by spatter, or jacket shear off steel, or something similar, not doubles.

    Troy

    I cannot find in the 2008 rules a definition of "ricochet" but the word appears on 9.5.5 in terms of scoring. Before assuming that "We all know what ricochets are, consider the following.

    The case it point: Last Saturday, I shot a match where plastic barrels were used as hard cover. One shot grazed the barrel and was slightly deflected and tumbled - but hit the scoring area of the target and was clearly the hole caused by a single, intact bullet.

    The RO claimed it was a "ricochet" and shouldn't count.

    I pointed out 9.1.6.3

    9.1.6.3 If a bullet strikes partially within hard cover, and continues on to

    strike the scoring area of a paper target, the hit on that paper target

    will count for score or penalty, as the case may be.

    Arguably, any bullet striking "partially within hard cover" will be deflected to some extent if that hard cover is any more substantial than paper. Are those to be considered ricochets?

    We get into other murky areas. On a stage I RO'ed, one shooter had some handloaded tumbling jacketed bullets that left no grease mark. Should these be counted as misses under 9.5.5?

    I like Troy's statement as to intent, but being anal retentive, I'd like to see it stated more clearly.

    Additionally, as a former editor of the written word, I'm bothered by "...unless there is visible evidence"within the remnants of the hole (e.g. a grease mark or a “crown” etc."

    Evidence of what?

    Might it be better if it said "evidence of passage of an intact bullet?"

  5. All our matches at Tri County are 3 gun (except our first match, which is a classifier). One thing you need to

    decide after you've visited some 3 gun matches is whether you are going to shoot 3 gun or multi gun. We've been

    shooting 3 gun for 3-4 years now and although its more work its also more fun. We have a core group of 4-5 RO's

    that design and set up the stages. We run 10 stages per match; 5 handgun (including one classifier), 3 shotgun and

    2 rifle. Usually around 200 total rounds per match. We shoot handgun in the morning, break for lunch (which is

    included in the match fee; $25.00) and then shoot long guns in the afternoon. Any questions feel free to contact me.

    Note that ther above post apparently does NOT refer to the Tri-County Gun Club at Sherwood, Oregon where we have three-gun matches, but not as described above.

  6. "moot" is spelled and used correctly!

    Well if nothing else comes out of this, at least I recieved a bit of an education in grammer.

    Grammer - the system of rules by which words are formed and put together to make sentences

    :D

    TG

    Well, it's actually spelled grammar.

×
×
  • Create New...