Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

ReconNav

Classified
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ReconNav

  1. On 3/14/2024 at 4:07 PM, MikeyScuba said:

    Eh.  The first class I ever attended was a Ben class.  Never again.  Too many people, Ben tends to focus on those who he thinks are worthy and we just spent most of the time blasting away on the sample stage.

     

     

    That was NOT my experience in Stoeger's  class.  I was one of the worst shooters in the class.  One guy was less accurate than me, but faster in gun handling and movement, and one was slower than me, but a little more accurate than me.  All of us, including the three of us at the bottom of the class, got the same amount of attention from Stoeger, and he was excellent at tailoring the instruction to what each person needed.  

     

    I was skeptical about taking the class, because of his rep, but some people I trust told me to ignore the rep, and just take the class.  I left very impressed with how well he ran that class, and came away with a couple of very valuable things that CHA-LEE calls, "solid nuggets," that were well worth the time, ammo, and money spent.

     

     

  2. On 5/2/2024 at 3:37 AM, DownUnder said:

    There are various 3d examples online. They have the same design problem, the funnel points are at the same level and rounds just skid along the funnel points instead of falling projectile down.

     

    Change the funnel height in the centre of each group of four funnels and you will get a better and faster sort. 

     

    There is no need for a deep sorter with plastic side walls. A thinner sorter as shown in the pic placed on top of the hundo works fine.

     

    Surround it with high box walls made from cardboard and it works a treat. Place hundo inside cardboard walls, place sorter on top, add ammo, shake around, remove cardboard walls. Quick and simple.

     

    Total materials cost about $1, or create walls from something more aesthetically pleasing for a small additional cost.

     

    20240428_084949.jpg

    1000004596.jpg

    Any chance there is someplace to download the files with that change already made?

     

    I have access to a 3D printer at the local library, but no ZERO about how to make that mod to the files I just downloaded from printables.com, that OptimiStick linked.

  3. On 4/29/2024 at 5:31 PM, slavex said:

    @mmc45414 being a non buildy type I haven't come up with a solution that will agitate the contents just right, that can attach to the drum. I tried some wood ribs inside and they just got eaten by the brass. Nothing but drum the brass just floats as the drum turns. Were I more handy at that kind of stuff I am sure there would be a solution. 

    Maybe you could coat the metal blades with brush on bed liner?

     

     

  4. I measured both (repeatedly) while setting up my press.  I haven't measured again in several thousand rounds. 

     

    Flare was set to .384", and has worked well, including with my new Lee Inline Bullet Feeder.

     

    The 6th edition of the "Ammo Encyclopedia" lists the mouth OD as .380" in the military section, and .3799" in the sporting section. However, I adjusted my Lee FCD die until a pulled bullet had a VERY light (almost imperceptible) impression on the Blue Bullets I'm using.  That measured at .376", prior to pulling the bullet, and I stopped adjusting it.  Even though that's .004" smaller than the specified OD in the book, its worked very well for me.

     

     

  5. 5 hours ago, fencer1960 said:

    I got a bunch of recent production once fired WWB brass, (I know it was once fired because I was there when the officers were qualifying)

    Was it the 124gr "NATO" white box?  I got a some of that brass from a friend with a local PD, and I couldn't get the primers to seat.   Sucks because they just switched to that as their training round, and he used to bring me a bucket of brass a couple times each year.  They used to use a Speer round that didn't have crimped pockets,and worked fine.

  6. I've used their warranty service twice.  The 1st time I asked to buy spare mounting screws, and they just them to me for free.  The 2nd time the manual adjust on a 407CO stopped working, and I followed the process at the website, shipped my optic back, and about a week and a half later it was sent back fixed.

  7. For dry fire, I'm a fan of the Dry Practice Drill app.

     

    It makes dry fire way less tedious, as you can set it up to do multiple reps, and even multiple strings with descending par times, so you start your drill, and don't have to constantly reset a timer for each rep.

     

    For good phones:  https://play.google.com/store/apps/details/Dry_Practice_Drill?id=com.sartuga.android.drypractice&hl=en_US

     

    For overpriced crappy phones:  https://apps.apple.com/us/app/dry-practice-drill/id828121161

  8. The "common use" argument is likely the best way to attack this.  The Internarional Practical Shooting Confederation (IPSC) has used the "Comstock" scoring method since its inception in 1976, and its still referenced in the rule book.  The rulebook states Comstock scoring is points divided by time, to get a "hit factor" score.

     

    This term in reference to scoring in shooting competitions is used world wide, by IPSC competitors.  Further in recent years, many shooting competitions, which are not USPSA affiliated, AND are documented on Practiscore, use "hit factor," scoring, and often are labeled as "hit factor" matches. 

     

    In addition, at least one sitting US Practical Shooting Association (USPSA) board member has paid to participate in non-USPSA "hit factor" matches (including as recently as December 28, 2023 as documented on Practiscore), and there was no objection to the use of the term, by that board member, or any other entity at USPSA, prior to the filing of the trademark application.

     

    There is also a current podcast called, "Hit Factor," which is focused on competitive shooting.  That podcast has over 173 episodes, starting in July 2019, through December 2023. 

     

    The term was in common use, worlwide, prior to the formation of USPA (IPSC 1976), and has been in common use in other shooting related contexts, for many years, prior to the application for the trademark, by USPSA.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...