dranged
-
Posts
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Profiles
Events
Store
Posts posted by dranged
-
-
I think I'd go with the 17. Looks like 17 has 3/4 of an ounce lighter slide which after optic is added would cycle similar to 34 I'm thinking.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Have you thought at all about strikers. I've found a titanium striker, while expensive, is very hard and lite which offers very positive break and extremely reliable even with lighter springs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
It looks like Carver Custom carries KKM and Lonewolf 40-9 conversion barrels threaded for a comp on their site
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
I went from Warren Sevigny competition to the Dawson's the .105"wide front because the fiber is longer and pops brighter than the Warren FO. I also like how the Dawson rears have a little narrower rear notch. The are just as fast but with a little tighter long range accuracy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Does it run in your gun? Accuracy? I've run 3.0 gr. of Titegroup with 147 gr BBI's at 1.120 OAL and pleased with performance but haven't shot through chrono. Glock 34
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I've run the Warren .115 for a year and am going to Dawson .105 front with tighter rear notch as well to tighten up my 34 a little.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Grip Angle
in Glock
Posted
I would concur with Dr Mitch. It doesn't matter at all to me. I reached USPSA Master class in Production div with 34, started with 35. I go back and forth between G34 and 1911 in single stack. I think you nailed it if everything is "right there" for you. Gun games are more to me about preparation during the week than what tool you take to match. Good luck come play!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk