Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

JamesF

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JamesF

  1. 6 hours ago, StealthyBlagga said:

     

    I evidently have more experience inspecting ammo than you do. I have seen several brands of commercial ammo with a brass case and a steel jacket (I gave an example above, and have seen it in .223 also). M855/SS109 ammo does not necessarily present with a green painted tip either. Conversely, I have seen steel cased ammo with non-steel projectiles. You simply can't be sure just by looking. Moreover, I expect everyone that runs the timer to be able to perform this check, so I need a test that does not rely on them having the same extensive expertise you claim.

     

    Not exactly what I was getting at.  Have you ever seen any steel case Tula/Wolf/Barnaul/BrownBear/SilverBear ammo with a steel core?  I have not, and it's pretty easy to tell what you're looking at if it has a steel case.

  2. The biggest problem with all the anecdotes of "such and such ammo will put a hole clean through a target, I seent it!" is that you're talking about used steel!  It's already got hits, and you can easily put a hole in a used target even with mild ammo if it's beat up enough - especially if your hit lands right on top of a decent crater that's already there.

     

    This is the reason why we used a brand new target, and marked all hits with a sharpie instead of painting over them.  We wanted to make sure we weren't counting any doubled hits! If we had painted between hits, you wouldn't be able to tell.

     

     

    2 hours ago, ericm said:

     

    GOOD NEWS, EVERYBODY! THIS THREAD IS PROGRESSING NORMALLY!!!

     

    "No magnetic ammo. It's too destructive of steel"

    "Hey look, I (we) (they) shot a bunch of steel with all kinds of ammo, and the bi-metal (mild steel penetrator) (zinc plated) does less damage to the steel than some gilding metal loads."

    "Well we're still gonna disallow it; and besides it starts fires..."

     

    Haha pretty much.

     

    Living in the green part of the midwest, we have zero fire risk at our range and not many rocks to throw sparks.  Our berms are dirt and usually covered in green grass.

     

    For S&Gs, I brought my 5.45 AR with me to the range and shot the s--t out of one of our newer pieces of AR-500 at 50yd.  Probaby put 90 rounds of 7N6 on it plus five of lead core/steel jacket silver bear to clean out the corrosive stuff.  When I went downrange to inspect the target, it was awesome how little damage there was.  I think Wolf Gold .223 (no steel, will not attract a magnet) does more damage out of my 17" AR than 7N6 does out of my 16" 5.45 AR.

  3. I dunno man, if you can't tell the difference between M855 and Tula/Wolf steel case without a magnet, you might want to find jobs other than checking ammo.

     

    If someone's dumb enough to load M855 penetrators with the green paint wiped off into steel cases to try and get a pass, they're also dumb enough to load 28 rounds of M855 into a magazine with the top two being regular brass ammo in order to get one over on you. 

  4. We didn't test 308 ammo.  I've never seen anyone bring 308 ammo that attracts a magnet to our match.

     

    We use strap hung targets at our match and our max range is 200yd.  It works really well for us, when the targets are painted brightly it's easy to call hits at 200yd with the naked eye, even on our 6" target.

     

    What I have seen a lot of at our matches is people bringing steel case 223 ammo.  We followed the 3GN rules on this in the past and officially didn't allow it, but when people showed up to our match I would give them a pass the first time around.  Some of the steel we shoot at our matches is steel that I and the other gentleman in the video lend to the range for matches and I already knew that the steel jacket 223 wouldn't damage the steel.

     

    Now that 3GN has officially changed their tune, we're following suit.  You can do as you like obviously.  We're making an effort to cater to the consumer who ultimately pays for these targets through the match fee.

  5. 11 hours ago, RiggerJJ said:

    I could give a rats a$$ how many videos are made. I've heard all the excuses and justifications it seems like thousands of times. Fact is they do damage steel targets, and they are our targets, so our rules apply. After spending thousands on steel targets I see no justification for people to save a couple of pennies per round just to punch holes in our targets. 

     

    Don't bring banned ammo to any of our matches, to include steel projectiles and over speed (M193). Use it and get caught, match DQ. Its in the match rules, please follow them.

    jj

     

    Wow, dude,  You would have thought we made this video to personally attack you and your match by that response.

     

    We were going to do this test anyway to see what ammo we should allow at our matches, and decided to film it and share for the benefit of others.  If you don't want to learn anything from it, you don't have to learn anything from it.  Nobody's going to beat a door to your place demanding to shoot Tula, calm down.

     

    If you had bothered to watch the video, our conclusion was that M193 or any hot 55gr (to include Wolf Gold 223 which is steel-free ammo loaded by a Taiwanese plant that makes M193 for the Taiwan military) is a bad idea out of longer barrels.  It makes a decent crater at 100yd and a huge one at 50yd.  M855 is a bad idea period. And the steel jacketed stuff was nearly indiscernible from lead/copper 69gr and 75gr.  Very little damage because it's not moving fast enough.

     

    Also, 7.62x39 steel jacketed lead core ammo (which is almost ALL 7.62x39 ammo) doesn't do ANY damage to the targets, not even a little pin prick at 50yd.  I'd be beyond happy if everybody showed up to our matches shooting steel cased 7.62x39 because our steel would last forever.  But that won't happen.

     

    Also, surprisingly (to me at least) 5.45 7N6 surplus ammo had pretty identical effects on target when compared to 69gr and 75gr .223 lead core/copper jacket ammo.  We won't be banning that at our matches, either.

  6. 6 hours ago, mosher said:

    We had a guy inadvertently shoot our MGM star at about 13 yards with 223 and it held up just fine.

     

    Depending on the muzzle velocity, I don't doubt it.  The main danger in shooting inside of 50 yards is spall.  You get a lot more stuff coming back at you than you do with pistol rounds.  That goes for shotgun slugs as well.

  7. We've had a lot of people that show up to our 3-gun matches wanting to shoot steel jacketed ammo at our rifle steel over the years.
     
    I've always known it wasn't a problem, but rules were rules.  I don't know how many of you noticed but 3GN altered the rules at some point (I think just this year) seemingly to allow steel jacketed ammo:
     

    Quote

    9.1.2 Tracer, incendiary, armor piercing or steel/tungsten/composite core projectiles are NOT allowed and are prohibited from use on all steel targets.


     
    That part of the rules used to specifically mention steel jackets.
     
    Anyway, I've long been of the opinion that what you really need to watch out for is people shooting hot 55gr out of longer (20"+) barrels, especially if you get down to (what's generally considered to be) the minimum safe distance of 50yd.  Other disciplines like PRS-style matches where not everybody is shooting a .223 tend to institute a speed limit stated in FPS.
     
    We were going to test this just for our club, but we decided to make a video out of it for your enjoyment.  We shot M855, M193, 5.45 7N6, steel jacketed ("bimetal") Tula 223, and plenty of other ammo at a new piece of AR500:

     

    Enjoy: 


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47VrSrlF498

  8. I am almost finished setting my Franchi Affinity up for 3-Gun. I did not discover this thread or the above video until recently. I spent some time reviewing pictures and videos of various corresponding Franchi and Benelli parts and decided to experiment about six months ago. I put the TTI Benelli carrier in (fits perfectly), the TTI extended safety on, and a Nordic extension tube with lightweight teflon follower. I'm having a gunsmith put the Briley extended bolt release on and am having the loading port opened (not as much as some people) and beveled (professionally). I really like the gun. I've shot it in two two-gun matches and did well. It does have better fit and finish than the Stoeger, but I may be getting an M3k 3-Gun as backup (and even use in some matches).

    Cool! That's about what I did... I looked at them in person, and examined pictures of parts and parts diagrams and compared that to what I knew about my M2.

    It makes sense that Benelli didn't reinvent the wheel, especially if (as I suspect) many of these parts are made on the same equipment in the same facility.

    Were I you, I'd wait on another Affinity to go on sale vs. getting the M3K since you'll have more parts commonality.

    ETA: whereabouts are you in Iowa? We run 3-gun matches in Osceola.

  9. For 3-gun purposes, enough parts interchange that you can set one up for 3-gun pretty easily.

    Parts that fit with no mods:

    M2 carriers (like the TTI extended carrier.)

    M2 bolt handles

    M2 hammers

    Stoeger M2000 extension tubes (Nordic)

    Parts that fit with minor mods:

    M2 safeties

    M2 oversized bolt release (M2 requires same mod in fairness)

    I'm setting the Franchi up in my vid for 3-gun but I'm still too new and untrustworthy to post links. Subscribe to my channel and you'll get the vids as they come out.

  10. I did not know that about the M3K! But I also haven't seen one in the wild. Where are they all going?

    The extended carrier is a must IMO. I tried practicing my load with the factory carrier on the Franchi after I opened up the port (vid soon) and I had to swap my M2's trigger group in almost immediately. That forked devil has it in for my thumb.

    As for the bolt handle, the only reason I like having a bigger round one is doing weak hand slug changeovers. I can hold the gun comfortably against my shoulder with my right index finger wrapped around the handle holding the bolt back (and the whole gun up) while I pop the slug into the ejection port with my left hand. Doing that with the factory bolt handle is pretty painful.

  11. If you're not comfortable making parts fit, being able to drop in an unmodified Taran Tactical extended carrier is nice. You can do that on the Stoeger with some filing or dremeling but it won't work out of the box.

    M2 charging handles also fit without modification.

    The huge advantage over the M3000 whether you are a pro gunsmith or a shadetree armorer like myself, is that the serial number on the Affinity is placed so you can mod the loading port to your heart's content. The serial number location on the Stoeger is really annoying.

    Somebody wanna hotlink my video? :D

  12. I finally got my hands on a Franchi Affinity and made a video comparing it to my Benelli M2 with 3-gun in mind.

    I think the Franchi is Benelli's idea of what a Stoeger should be. It has a lot more Benelli DNA and many of the Stoeger caveats don't apply.

    This shotgun has been severely overlooked in the 3-gun world in my opinion. For 200-300 more than a Stoeger and ~400 less than an M2, you get most of the Benelli quality and better parts compatibility with the M2 to boot.

    My post count isn't high enough to post links yet, but if you search for "Franchi Affinity vs Benelli M2 for 3-Gun" on YouTube, it's the first result. Maybe someone can hotlink the vid for me!

×
×
  • Create New...