Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

tulsashooter45

Classified
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tulsashooter45

  1. It took me awhile but I had to voice my opinion:

    Sanders sandfam7300@gmail.com
    Feb 7 (2 days ago)
    cleardot.gif
    cleardot.gif
    cleardot.gif
    to Area5, John, Kim, president
    cleardot.gif
    To all concerned,
    I am writing this letter to voice my displeasure as a paying member of USPSA in the recent string of decisions made by the organization's leadership. In my opinion these arbitrary decisions were misguided and poorly conceived and executed.
    It would be very easy for me to say I am not a revolver shooter, so I don't care what decisions are made pertaining to that division as long as those decisions only affect those within the division. But unfortunately, as becomes more evident every day, that is not the case. When the revolver rules were changed to allow 8 shot minor it set into motion a ripple effect that ultimately resulted in the "retirement" of a significant number of classifiers. Many of those classifiers were tried and true tests that have endured for years. But more importantly many were of the brand new 13 series which promised to inject much needed enhancements into the classification system. Locally we were looking forward to working our way through the new classifiers this coming year.
    I feel the best interest of the membership at large has been cast aside in the interest of appeasing the relatively minor number of revolver shooters in USPSA. I use the word minor to describe what is typically one shooter at any given match in my local area. Occasionally a few will sign up to shoot a match but those instances are rare. The matches I frequent on a monthly basis typically consist of 50 or more shooters so you can see that one or two revolver shooters is indeed a very small percentage.
    To make matters even worse, not all revolver shooters were even in favor of making the change to the rules in their division. In essence this makes the number of revolver shooters who wanted the rules change statistically insignificant.
    I would like to strongly urge all USPSA leadership to aggressively work on a solution to the problems these decisions created in the classification system. The goal of such a solution should be to reinstate the retired classifiers immediately. This could easily be done with only minimal alterations to the WSB's that would create inequity among the revolvers of different types. Simply requiring reloads for revolver shooters is one easy fix. Or since those who made the rule change thought it would put the two types of revolvers on equal ground with minor and MAJOR scoring, let revolvers shoot head to head. Of course, that was not well thought out and would result in significant advantages to the 8 shot revolvers but it would be much more fair to the overwhelming majority of the members of USPSA.
    Regards,
    Kevin Sanders
    TY64885

    VERY well said Sir

×
×
  • Create New...