Mistral404 Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 (edited) I just started to read my Front Sight. I read the first two letters about the SVI ads. I just can not believe there are folks out there with such smut in their minds. Finch calling the ad pornography is ludicrious. Then tryig to tie a cause and effect explanation is bad science and he should know better. Again it shows how a few slightly higher educated folks can use their "credentials" as universal authority on the matter. If he thinks that innocuous ad is pornography and he is in the business of helping sexually dysfunctional people perhaps he is in the wrong business or providing mis-guided help. How about the many men out there who are "NOT TRIGGERED" by such visual stimuli. I know that the offended are more likely to write a negative letter than those who were not offended. I hope Dave Thomas et.al., do not use the narrow minded views of a few to speak for the majority. Sorry for the rant. I really hate narrow minded folks--yep, I know I am narrow minded about my narrow mindedness. As a last note: perhaps if he met the model he would come away with a different opinion. Edited January 6, 2007 by Mistral404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.