Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Flowing


Flexmoney

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have found that if I shoot a stage in a way that I feel flows well it's much easier to shoot it well than if I shoot it in a way that doesn't feel like it flows well. On average I can shoot a stage well more consistently if my plan feels like it flows well, even if it's not the fastest possible plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have found that if I shoot a stage in a way that I feel flows well it's much easier to shoot it well than if I shoot it in a way that doesn't feel like it flows well. On average I can shoot a stage well more consistently if my plan feels like it flows well, even if it's not the fastest possible plan.

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flowing is a form of stability.

For me, flowing is the most important aspect of my mental game. Interrupt my "flow" and I become hesitant and tentative across the board. That's why I hate "memory stages" and I despise stages that toss the tenants of freestyle to the wind. Looks like I need to work on my mental "flow" as much or more than flowing physically when I execute "the plan".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True...although I think I thought it slow in reflecting back on what had happened. When it was happening, it wasn't fast or slow, it was just happening. And if you mean by "executing" that things happened as they needed to, then, yes, I executed. But it did not seem as though I was "doing" or "making" anything happen. It just happened as it should have, and I went with it ("flowed with the moment").

That sort of makes sense to me... :huh:

Edited by kevin c
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flowing means continuously being

Spook, I'm on the same page as you.

But, it begs the question....what if the flow stops? Do we cease being?

Do people who never experience the flow, die, without having lived?

Jesus cautioned his followers, "whoever puts his hand to the plow, and then looks back, is not fit for the kingdom of God." I'm no scholar, but I have to presume that the plow and the kingdom are metaphorically the same in this statement. There is only the feel of the earth under my feet and the flow of the plow through the dirt. I drink in the sounds and the smell of the rich earth. The day is hot, but it feels good to me. Hard ground, easy ground, rocks, it doesn't matter. I just need to focus on the plow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reference: http://www.d-n-i.net/boyd/pdf/strategy.pdf

Words from John Boyd, the fight pilot that originated the OODA Loop concept.

Pages 19 & 20 in particular...

I am always preaching about shooting from a strong and stable platform. I have some top-rated shooting buddies that I know aren't really concerned with hammering that idea home.

Here are a couple of things you will hear me say:

- As long as you can line the tube (barrel) up on the target, it doesn't matter if you are hanging up-side-down from a set of monkey bars and pulling the trigger with you pinky toe...as long as the barrel is in line with the target when the gun goes off, you will hit the target. However, that shooting platform won't provide you with enough foundation to return the gun for the next shot. It won't even provide you with the stability to make single shots in a consistent manner.

- Now, the argument can be made that...who cares? Just line the sights up again as needed and rock-n-roll. And, there is some merit there. The merit, however, is more easily found by the shooter who is already at the top of the score sheet. She/he has enough rounds down range that her/his platform is what it is. Watching top shooters, they often seem like their platform is always in flux.

- I like to use basketball as an example. Nobody is winging shots from the free-throw line. There, they shoot with the most stable platform they can come up with. It a free throw...no time restraint, no defense being played on them. The basketball shooters is almost always better off taking the shot from the most stable platform. Now...insert Dr. J (did he start it all?) or Mike Jordan...etc. Those guys shoot...very well...from a variety of positions.

Now, this flow stuff. After reading from the discourse that I referenced above, some thoughts came too me that I think help me put the concept of stability while "flowing" into words.

The reading mentions a city..with constant inputs and constant outputs. It mentions structures being constant, with the consistency coming from the flow of it's "stuff".

The thought that came to mind for me is the big river that runs near my home town. That river, is constantly changing. The same water is never in the same place twice. Yet, that river has been there for years upon years. Even though it is liquid, it's not something that I could easily change. It's flow is stable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flowing is a concept, in this forum shooting-related.....

As one acts, flowing is the result of one's actions.

If the shootist is able to maintain balance between circumstances (out) en "the Plan"(in) (whatever that is) he/she is in an equilibrium and therefore, flows.....

Edited by schmitz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flex, I really like the river anaolgy. If I might take it a bit further, what makes a river a river? Water molecules are pretty easily dispersed. Without the right conditions the droplets wouldn't come together. And once together, would they flow?

So, in a river, we have a cohesive medium, water. We have a path, the channel. And we have a driving force, gravity. From my shooter's eye, I see the water as a stream of shots. The river channel as my plan, and my intention as the driving force. The water (shot) flows where the channel (plan) takes it, at a rate determined by gravity (intention).

Back in school, the gang did a lot of float trips on various rivers. Sometimes we would end up just sitting quitely and watching the river flow by. At some point my buddy Steve would usually say in the most profound voice possible, " life...... is like a river". To which someone else would invaribly take the bait and inquire, "How is it like a river?"

Steve -"I don't know...... it just is" :P

Sometimes that's all there is to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flowing is a form of stability.
-Flex

Dispersion lacks cohesiveness and drifts aimlessly.

Rigidity has too much stability and cannot flow at all.

Flow is stability in balance.

Sand falling in an hour glass is a measure of time. But, there is a point for each individual grain where it has left the upper chamber, but has not arrived in the lower mound of sand. Those grains are the only ones in flow. They are, for the moment, free of time.

Flex, could we say that flow is stability, freed from the constraints of time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...