R/T Performance Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 Here is my Xd 40 tac on a cr speed belt with speed comp mag holders . I have long arms so I inverted the hangers are they still legal? Sorry had to use a mirror to do the ons geuss shoulda washed it first :lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ima45dv8 Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 I can't see any reason they would be considered non-compliant. LAMR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Stoeger Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 How do you like your speed comp pouches? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blockhead Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 Your positioning of the mag.s and the holster looks ok. The only thing I'd worry about is the max. 50mm (just under 2") dimension called for in Appendix US-D9. Rule 5.2.5 says that you check compliance by "measuring the closest distance between the competitor's torso and the center of the longest dimension of ... any reloading device". I've never seen it measured so I'm not quite sure how it would work. I'm taking the L1 RO seminar this weekend and will ask. In any case, nice XD setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j2fast Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 (edited) How do you like your speed comp pouches? I used the speed comps in Production and loved them; to use their sales pitch they really do put the mags in a good position. No twisting of your wrist and you can get 5 in the same space as 4 UM's type pouches on your belt. Looks good R/T, I worried a little about the spacing but when I measured it was good for me. I think you can get thinner spacers from Speed Comp if distance is an issue. Edited May 19, 2006 by j2fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Baier Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 R/T, You are good to go. By the way Livingston Gun club is hosting its regular mothly match May 28 if you can make it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ima45dv8 Posted May 19, 2006 Share Posted May 19, 2006 Your positioning of the mag.s and the holster looks ok. The only thing I'd worry about is the max. 50mm (just under 2") dimension called for in Appendix US-D9. Rule 5.2.5 says that you check compliance by "measuring the closest distance between the competitor's torso and the center of the longest dimension of ... any reloading device". I've never seen it measured so I'm not quite sure how it would work. I'm taking the L1 RO seminar this weekend and will ask.In any case, nice XD setup. As a quick check, insert the short side of a USPSA overlay between the mags and the closest point on the body (Dunlop Disease helps in this scenario). They measure ~50mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R/T Performance Posted May 20, 2006 Author Share Posted May 20, 2006 Thanks Fellas I measured it and it close but in. I practice with them today and the mags changes seem real good to me. Most right around 3.5-4.0 . I like the fact when canted the height drop is perfect and reverse the hanger made a huge improvement for me.Bieng a knuckle drag-er. Of to sksc tomorrow for there classifier might be able to squeeze in another this month I hope.Depends on how the step daughter move goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRT Driver Posted May 20, 2006 Share Posted May 20, 2006 5.2.7.2 covers holsters only. It says that the butt of the pistol can't be below the top of the belt. Nothing about mags though. If you need some thinner spacers, PM me. I'll bring some to the Pistol-Gear Group Shoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Baier Posted May 20, 2006 Share Posted May 20, 2006 5.2.7.2 covers holsters only. It says that the butt of the pistol can't be below the top of the belt. Nothing about mags though.If you need some thinner spacers, PM me. I'll bring some to the Pistol-Gear Group Shoot. 5.2.5 Where a Division specifies a maximum distance that a competitor’s handgun and equipment may extend away from a competitor’s body, a Range Officer may check compliance by measuring the closest distance between the competitor’s torso and the center of the longest dimension of the handgun grip and/or any reloading devices. that being said. You would still be ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRT Driver Posted May 20, 2006 Share Posted May 20, 2006 Yup! 5.2.5 covers horizontal distance. 5.2.7.2 covers vertical distance but for holsters only. As long as his belt is around his waist and attached by at least 3 belt loops, he should be OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blockhead Posted May 21, 2006 Share Posted May 21, 2006 Talked to Carl Schmidt today at a L1 RO Seminar. He confirmed that the speed comp. pouches are ok Production. He had recieved a similar inquiry from a shooter that will be using them at the West Coast Production/Single Stack match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R/T Performance Posted May 21, 2006 Author Share Posted May 21, 2006 These ar way faster than my quad blade tech I shot a qualifier match had a gun spring failure on the first stage Replaced and had another brain fart later but the gear is great . These are awesome holders and I would recommend then to anyone looking to gain an edge. Special thanks to Speed comp who told me just how to invert the hangers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now