Ohvall Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 I rarely see threads about the FN 509. Why is that? I know that FN has a poor history of supporting competitive shooters, their magazines are over-priced, their triggers are only a bit better than Glock's, and aftermarket parts and holsters are scarce. But it does seem like a 509 Tactical could be competitive in Carry Optics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thx1138jt Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 I think you answered your own question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MemphisMechanic Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 ”this gun has several major drawbacks, while SIG CZ and Walther are practically cramming parts support down our throats...” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanb Posted August 12, 2019 Share Posted August 12, 2019 I was completely underwhelmed when I fondled one. It was no better than a stock Glock and that’s the problem when there isn’t any aftermarket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMP Posted August 29, 2019 Share Posted August 29, 2019 My brother has one I shoot and load for. I like the grip/feel and it's very accurate for a poly duty gun. But, the trigger is terrible. The hinged safety contributes to this and the skeletonized Stryker riding on the spring gives a gritty feel to the pre travel. It's also heavy. I fixed it up quite a bit by polishing parts and trimming springs. Not bad now but not great either. Apex has a kit but it requires removal of the front block which is a PIA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anachronism Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 I have an FNS, and the trigger pull started out pretty rough, but it settled in nicely with just a few range sessions. I really like this gun. My problem with FN is a nagging feeling that FN itself is not trustworthy, and even though I don't have any firsthand issues with them, I still can't shake the mistrust. FNs history of discontinuing parts and support for non-current models is troubling to me. Instead of a 509 Tactical, I'm waiting for the M&P 2.0 COREs to come out. I almost gave CZ a try, but I don't dig the grip angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magsz Posted September 20, 2019 Share Posted September 20, 2019 The ergo's are quite good. The overall package that is offered is quite good, ie nice grip angle decent texture, excellent serrations fore and aft. The problem lies in the trigger. Its garbage, like, pure garbage. Its just plain bad. After a bazillion rounds (rentals) the triggers tend to clean up a bit but they're still heavy. Couple this with almost no aftermarket support (as you mentioned) and we are left with a platform that is hard to set up for gun games. To the best of my knowledge no one even makes a recoil rod so that we can tune the recoil impulse to our ammo. THAT right there is a MAJOR reason for me why im hesitant to put down money on one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now