Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

165gr 9mm and my Dillon.


thehudge
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello all, I have a Dillon square deal B and am trying to load xtreme 165gr round nose bullets. 

The problem is, I am getting crazy swings in my seating depths.  I have it set for a 1.150 oal and am getting that if I load one at a time but once I get all four stages going it starts seating from 1.145 to 1.160.  I have been reloading with this reloader for years and many thousands of rounds.

I really want this bullet to work but am stumped.  Any help would be appreciated.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you using mixed brass?  Those bullets are so long and have to be seated so deep in the case that variations in case wall thickness and taper from brand to brand could be causing the inconsistency.  


This [emoji1318]

Gets ya every time. I get .010 variations when loading 147gr round nose plated with mixed brass. You’ll make yourself crazy trying to fix it. Only way is to sort brass. No thank you.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SteelCityShooter said:

Are you using mixed brass?  Those bullets are so long and have to be seated so deep in the case that variations in case wall thickness and taper from brand to brand could be causing the inconsistency.  

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You said “I really want this bullet to work” so what’s not working? Is this affecting your accuracy, function or just messing with you mind? I run the exact same set up. Dillon 650 all factory dies with the exception of a horanady neck expander. I find the bullet sits better before seating with that die. 165 xtreme mixed brass, win primers and 3.8 gr TG. Set to COL of 1.157. My experience with this shows a range of 1.149 to 1.17. But every one feeds and goes bang just like the last. I run them primarily out of my STI but have also shot them in my G34 and my PSA PCC. Never any issues.

So unless you are have issues with feeding or some really bad accuracy just feed the Blue machine and fire them off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve gone as far as to verify that if I set my COAL off of the “foreign” brass (S&B, ect) then my rounds with domestic brass will be shorter, and vice versa. And I do set my COAL with all stations full.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/22/2019 at 7:58 AM, Frank705 said:

You said “I really want this bullet to work” so what’s not working? Is this affecting your accuracy, function or just messing with you mind? I run the exact same set up. Dillon 650 all factory dies with the exception of a horanady neck expander. I find the bullet sits better before seating with that die. 165 xtreme mixed brass, win primers and 3.8 gr TG. Set to COL of 1.157. My experience with this shows a range of 1.149 to 1.17. But every one feeds and goes bang just like the last. I run them primarily out of my STI but have also shot them in my G34 and my PSA PCC. Never any issues.

So unless you are have issues with feeding or some really bad accuracy just feed the Blue machine and fire them off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did you mean 2.8gr of titegroup? 3.8gr sounds hot  for 160’s. Curious what your power factor is. 

 

Thanks!

 

Ethan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A while ago one of my shooting buddies wanted to go that route. 165s for his action shooting game of choice.  So we loaded a few hundred for test at the range.

That was the absolute longest I've ever been at the press to make a batch of 9mm.  Exactly as the OP mentioned. OAL that was just all over the place.

It settled down when we fed the press with new Starline - straight from the box.  Aside from the slight stick at the power funnel that is...

 

9mm brass is like a box of chocolates.... FED and WIN would be about the only thing I try to load the 165s with.   

(we ultimately abandoned that project for a number of reasons)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Eman said:

Did you mean 2.8gr of titegroup? 3.8gr sounds hot  for 160’s. Curious what your power factor is. 

 

Thanks!

 

Ethan 

I shot 160s all last year at 3.0 grains of titegroup and it put me at a 137 power factor out of my g34. They shot well but always seemed low for my point of aim. I now shoot145s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/21/2019 at 7:56 AM, SteelCityShooter said:

Are you using mixed brass?  Those bullets are so long and have to be seated so deep in the case that variations in case wall thickness and taper from brand to brand could be causing the inconsistency.  

 

Yup, this is your problem - internal case taper varies with different brands of brass. If you force that bullet into the cases with more taper and then use something like a Lee factory crimp die, you'll find that the bullet base gets swaged down (a bad thing) and some of them will even push back out of the case. I load some 170gr and 180gr subsonic 9mm bullets of my own design and ran into the same issues.

 

The solution if you want to use that bullet at that length is to sort brass and only use FC headstamp - FC has more straight wall and the taper is deeper in the case so it handles the long bullets OK. Win, Blazer, and S&B all give problems every time. 

 

The other solution is to seat to a long enough OAL that you don't run into the case taper on any brass, but your barrel has to be throated for it and the mags need to accomodate the long OAL. 

Edited by Yondering
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct.  After loading a thousand rounds with mixed brass, FC is the most consistent brass out of the bunch.  

I started separating based on head stamp..........That did not go well. So I guess Ill deal with it for now and if I ever make it to an Area Match I will use all FC head stamped brass for greater constancy.  

 

Thanks to all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/31/2019 at 5:43 PM, Yondering said:

The solution if you want to use that bullet at that length is to sort brass and only use FC headstamp - FC has more straight wall and the taper is deeper in the case so it handles the long bullets OK. Win, Blazer, and S&B all give problems every time. 

 

Using Federal brass is the right answer. Loading 165's is why I started sorting brass by headstamp. The brass you absolutely want to avoid is anything that's stepped on the inside, like FM, Ammoland, IMT and the like. A friend had case separation with 147's and stepped brass. It won't get better with 165's...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm loading my second batch of 3,000 bullets.  Other than some variation in OAL they look good and function great, also I do discard the stepped brass

I went with 10lb recoil springs in both the G34 gen5 and the P320rx, the combination is amazing. 

 

Thanks for all the input.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...