Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!
vgdvc

EGW HD or Practical model extractor?

Recommended Posts

Hello. I will be looking to fit a new extractor to my Brazos .38 Super STI slide open pistol. Original extractor functions well but want to have a backup on hand just in case. Rather than go with the Aftec I am planning on using a more traditional built-in extractor from EGW. Has anyone had experience or preferences with the two models offered, HD versus Practical? HD design may require different tension adjustment methods  than is commonly used or am I wrong? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 3/13/2019 at 11:14 AM, vgdvc said:

Has anyone had experience or preferences with the two models offered, HD versus Practical? HD design may require different tension adjustment methods  than is commonly used or am I wrong?

I use the HD exclusively so am used to fitting it.  The Practical should be easier to fit.  Tension adjustment method is the same as any other internal 1911 extractor.  The HD has lots of extra "meat" which is good and bad.  It's good because it allows you the greatest flexibility in fitting.  It's bad because it most definitely is not a drop in part.  When fitting any extractor you must address its geometry, deflection, and tension.  Failure to address the first two fitting components can result in lots of functioning problems.

 

For an in-depth tutorial on extractor fitting see this: https://forums.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=829865

Edited by Steve in Allentown PA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Steve in Allentown PA said:

I use the HD exclusively so am used to fitting it.  The Practical should be easier to fit.  Tension adjustment method is the same as any other internal 1911 extractor.  The HD has lots of extra "meat" which is good and bad.  It's good because it allows you the greatest flexibility in fitting.  It's bad because it most definitely is not a drop in part.  When fitting any extractor you must address its geometry, deflection, and tension.  Failure to address the first two fitting components can result in lots of functioning problems.

 

For an in-depth tutorial on extractor fitting see this: https://forums.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=829865

Thanks for the info. Seeing your name headline as a location indicator we must not be far from each other as I am about 40 mins. from Allentown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, vgdvc said:

Thanks for the info. Seeing your name headline as a location indicator we must not be far from each other as I am about 40 mins. from Allentown

I'm in Emmaus.  I used to visit Austin Behlert in Pipersville years ago when we lived in New Hope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Steve in Allentown PA said:

I'm in Emmaus.  I used to visit Austin Behlert in Pipersville years ago when we lived in New Hope.

Yep, I grew up 5 minutes away from Behlert Precision. Used to be a weekend hangout. Watched George Smith come up through the ranks there. I think the 625 S&W revolver I had Art Leckie do an action job to was one of the last pieces of work he did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just installed the HD version and tuning was easy and the first 500 or so rounds have been flawless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the Aftec in my limited rig but recently installed the practical extractor in a .40 1911 with a tightly fitted FP stop and it functions perfectly. They say the practical ex is rated at 70,000 cycles. For an open rig, I would probably look at the HD version due to the extra meat. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, hump said:

I just installed the HD version and tuning was easy and the first 500 or so rounds have been flawless

Thanks for the response. Is adjusting for tension the same as a traditional extractor  inserting part way in the channel hole and gently applying pressure to get the necessary bend? It looks like there is so much material up the main part of the shaft that a more aggressive means may have been necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, vgdvc said:

Thanks for the response. Is adjusting for tension the same as a traditional extractor  inserting part way in the channel hole and gently applying pressure to get the necessary bend? It looks like there is so much material up the main part of the shaft that a more aggressive means may have been necessary.

I use the Weigand bending tool and bending the EGW heavy duty extractor requires more effort than a traditionally shaped extractor.  But I don't break a sweat so it's not that bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve , when you see George, tell him Tommy Roupe  (Grip Man) said hello.  George gave me that name when I was doing grips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...