Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

A New SIG Max.....


MikieM

Recommended Posts

I just purchased a Sig Max 1911 in 9mm. From what I've read the gun is pretty much ready to compete other than perhaps doing a trigger job.

Does anyone have any experience with this particular firearm?

Edited by MikieM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I own two in 40cal. All I did was a trigger job so they are now 2.5lbs. Also as I shoot IPSC. had to change out the ice to an Ed  Brown so they'd fit the box. IMHO the plastic insert may not standup well (pun intended) to heavy use but as I say that's just a guess because I changed it out before really giving it a chance.

 

Really like mine and they run well.

 

 

Edited by Fergus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Odd that it didn't fit in the box with the ICE.

 

The Sig Max is series 80 right? If I were you, I'd buy the series 80 conversion kit (a few little block-off plugs and plates), and pick up a drop in trigger setup from Brazos or Dawson.  All you need to fit is the Thumb Safety locking block usually.  It's a bear the first time you do it, but just go slow, find some youtube videos, and make sure you do all your safety checks when you're done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked up a .40 a few years ago and replaced the series 80 stuff with a spacer and started shooting it. Has been a great gun, decided to get one in .45 ACP as a shooter and also a backup if I need it.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took Max to the range earlier with a hundred rounds of 147 FPs atop 3.5 grains of N320. One of the worst set of 5 shot groups I ever shot in my life. If this gun is accurate it isn't with 147 grain bullets. Going to try some 124s tomorrow.

The trigger sucks. It breaks at 4 pounds even. Going to have to do a trigger job and also get rid of the series 80 safety stuff.

The front sight is too high for my tastes, with the 147s. It causes the rear to be elevated to the point where it's almost wobbly.

I hope the 124s will print high so I can bring the rear sight down.

The mags that come with the gun are 8 round Wilson's. Can't use them.

For $1400.00 this thing is a loser, so far.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, MikieM said:

Took Max to the range earlier with a hundred rounds of 147 FPs atop 3.5 grains of N320. One of the worst set of 5 shot groups I ever shot in my life. If this gun is accurate it isn't with 147 grain bullets. Going to try some 124s tomorrow.

The trigger sucks. It breaks at 4 pounds even. Going to have to do a trigger job and also get rid of the series 80 safety stuff.

The front sight is too high for my tastes, with the 147s. It causes the rear to be elevated to the point where it's almost wobbly.

I hope the 124s will print high so I can bring the rear sight down.

The mags that come with the gun are 8 round Wilson's. Can't use them.

For $1400.00 this thing is a loser, so far.

 

 

Does not sound like you are a fan.

 

Curious if any you single stackers has tried one of these https://ruger.com/products/sr1911/specSheets/6759.html

 

I had one of the 45s when they first came out. I had a hard time complaining about anything on that gun - especially for the price. Wish I would not have sold it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've really enjoyed mine in .40. It was reliable right out of the box with Wilson 10mm mags and long OAL ammo. I too removed the series 80 garbage and performed a trigger job. Great factory option for SS, however, they recently discontinued the .40 model. I wish I had bought a second when they were readily available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, IsaacB said:

I heard that these use the same slide for 9mm and 40. If that's the case, you could have a dual caliber gun with an extra barrel. Are you able to fit a 40sw round in the breach face?

 I'll try it and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AlexV said:

I've really enjoyed mine in .40. It was reliable right out of the box with Wilson 10mm mags and long OAL ammo. I too removed the series 80 garbage and performed a trigger job. Great factory option for SS, however, they recently discontinued the .40 model. I wish I had bought a second when they were readily available. 

 

There is no question as to it's reliability. 200 rounds down the tube and no malfunctions at all.

As soon as the spacer comes in I'll do a trigger job. And while I'm at it I'm going to change the trigger. I'm not a big fan of flat triggers.

A stiff 4 pound pull would also affect off-hand accuracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I converted mine from a series 80 to 70, did a little trigger work, and changed the mag well to a Dan Wesson ss one for better weight and balance.

Managed to get the trigger below 3 lbs.

 

 

 

Edited by rlrock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I removed the series 80 stuff and installed a shim. I took out the stainless guide rod and put back the original parts. The recoil spring is 9 pounds and the mainspring is 17.

 

Trigger pull is now 2 pounds 15 ounces on average. Come Winter I'll have our local gunsmith do a proper trigger job. I would like to see it at 2 1/4 to 2 1/2 pounds.

 

I think adding the guide rod caused the accuracy to decline. The frame and slide comes hand fitted from the factory shop and when the guide rod was installed some internal binding may have occurred. Just a guess though.

 

Anyway, accuracy is good now and reliability appears to be 100% with RN bullets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...