Glock 34 vs M&P 2.0 5”

[Honeybooboo]

I have both but I’m just curious as to what others think that may have shot both. 

[shakazulu12]

I would be curious as to your thoughts as well.  I know it's the indian, not the arrow.  But both are on the menu and I'm over thinking it.

[Honeybooboo]

It’s a tough call. Both can be super competitive. Both shoot soft. Glocks are good because of the low bores and aggressive grip angles. The gen 5 triggers are really nice. Easy to work on and replace stuff. 

 

The 2.0 has a low bore too and a very rough grip texture so stays put. Could probably use some more stippling higher on the grip though. The trigger is good. Really light from the factory. 

 

I still think it’s a toss up. 

[lumberjack149]

Both good guns.  I've shot both and the only bad thing I have to say about either is the 2.0 takes more concentration to reload quickly as the opening is smaller than the original m&p and quite a bit smaller than the Glocks grip/magwell.

[myproverb]

I think the performance will be the same; the other factors will be replacement parts & trigger (after a trigger job has been done).

[Hi-Power Jack]

How's the 25 yard accuracy ?