Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!
Akkid17

Polymer 80 in carry optics?

Recommended Posts

I have been thinking about getting a Carry optics rig put together and since you can use a lot of the aftermarket slides and barrels that are out now for glock style parts would it be possible to use a polymer 80 frame? As long as it complies with the stippling/modification rules I would think it would be nice to have more options especially since the new 17 frame is borderline a timber wolf frame that doesn't have that irritating hump on the back. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You gotta get past this:

 

"— A handgun may be approved specifically for Carry Optics division provided that the model of the pistol used is an approved Production Division model AND meets Carry Optics criteria. Any pistol that is not on the approved Production list, but meets Carry Optics criteria must submit a Manufacturers Declaration Form to DNROI stating that a minimum of 500 complete handguns have been manufactured and are available to the general public"

 

and this:

 

"— UNLESS a modification is SPECIFICALLY authorized in the rules or SPECIFICALLY authorized in an official, published NROI interpretation, it is considered a PROHIBITED MODIFICATION."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All those rules you have to read, how disappointing.... Or you could just run an OEM Glock with a dot.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only glock I can stand is the gen4 19 and not thrilled about using a compact for carry optics. The new P80 17/34 frame looked like it would be awesome for a non glock feeling CO gun. Guess I'll just have to wait and save up for a CZ of some sort 

Edited by Akkid17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Akkid17 said:

Guess I'll just have to wait and save up for a CZ of some sort 

 

If you like the G19 feel, I highly suggest you get your hands on a Walther Q5 Match. And it’s already setup for Carry Optics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... and all this is why the M&P is a thing :D

 

If Glock could get over their own arrogant "Austrian Grip is Best Grip" thinking, these other polymer striker fired guns would be mere footnotes in history.

Edited by StealthyBlagga

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The g19 doesn't have as pronounced of a hump, especially with the medium beaver tail back strap on it, which it why I can deal with it. And yes, if glock would put out a model that was basically an OEM version of the P80 frame with the MOS option on it I'd probably pick one up for carry optics. 

If I were to get an m&p I'd just pick up the 5" model since it's not the frame size that's the issue it's the shape. But I've had 3 m&p's over the years and unless they have been able to vastly improve the 9mm accuracy and the trigger I'll stick with the cz direction. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly the Glock grip is a product of mechanical function rather than ergonomics or user interface. So it will never change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/23/2017 at 2:21 PM, StealthyBlagga said:

... and all this is why the M&P is a thing :D

 

If Glock could get over their own arrogant "Austrian Grip is Best Grip" thinking, these other polymer striker fired guns would be mere footnotes in history.

 

But perfection

 

 

 

 

 

 

:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sight radius is irrelevant to CO

Mag limit is 140mm

Maybe an extra tenth of a grain to make minor.

What's the issue with the 19? If you have one anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Beef15 said:

Sight radius is irrelevant to CO

Mag limit is 140mm

Maybe an extra tenth of a grain to make minor.

What's the issue with the 19? If you have one anyway.

I don't have the mos version, and while sight radius is irrelevant grip length is not, I was wanting a full size frame and the reason the 19 isn't bothersome with the hump on the back strap is because it's shorter but a full size frame is preferred for competition. This was more just wishful thinking on easily attained parts and accessories

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎9‎/‎24‎/‎2017 at 12:15 PM, Akkid17 said:

But I've had 3 m&p's over the years and unless they have been able to vastly improve the 9mm accuracy and the trigger I'll stick with the cz direction. 

 

I've not shot that many M&P's, but I know a few people who have that say the new 2.0 versions are what the original should have been.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since P80 is now offering a serialized version now, it should qualify easliy for production/co since they're so popular and if they submit the paperwork. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎4‎/‎8‎/‎2019 at 2:52 PM, Davidp1911 said:

Since P80 is now offering a serialized version now, it should qualify easliy for production/co since they're so popular and if they submit the paperwork. 

Key words being, "if they submit the paperwork".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...