Hi-Power Jack Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 Back in the 70's, we didn't spend so much time worrying about getting shot, accidentally, as we do today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revoman Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 4 hours ago, Hi-Power Jack said: Back in the 70's, we didn't spend so much time worrying about getting shot, accidentally, as we do today Wouldn't it hurt just as much back then as it would today. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perttime Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 44 minutes ago, revoman said: Wouldn't it hurt just as much back then as it would today. LOL Totally irrelevant. People worry about too many things now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revoman Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 14 minutes ago, perttime said: Totally irrelevant. People worry about too many things now. It would still hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrumpyOne Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 5 hours ago, Hi-Power Jack said: Back in the 70's, we didn't spend so much time worrying about getting shot, accidentally, as we do today You mean the 1870's, Jack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warpspeed Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 An interesting topic - good suggestions all but really what we need in the world or practical shooting is a Hall of Fame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesquire Posted August 20, 2017 Author Share Posted August 20, 2017 1 hour ago, warpspeed said: An interesting topic - good suggestions all but really what we need in the world or practical shooting is a Hall of Fame. Generally Mount Rushmore conversations are just something to get sports TV shows more viewers. BUT it acknowledges the history of the sport and anything that pushes the view of USPSA towards a sport is a good thing. I also think we should do something like an all-star game. Teams East vs West in a Pro-Am style match. All steel. Easy to televise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJH Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 Rob Leathem Todd Jarret Dave Sevigney And Nils Jonasson Why them and not Max, Stoger, and even Jerry? Because those guys while great, they are specialist. My group has won across divisions, and also they have all also won the worlds, and while it is IPSC and not USPSA, I think it does have some bearing. (I did not include 3 gun, or else Jerry would be on there for sure) Also while looking back TGO is the undisputed champ, but TJ was just almost as dominate, just not for as long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve RA Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 I don't think I'd call Jerry a specialist considering he's won more in various shooting endeavors than any of the others. I certainly think he should be included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hi-Power Jack Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 4 hours ago, GrumpyOne said: You mean the 1870's, Jack? No, Grump, the 1770's .... I was the only one shooting SS, then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, Hi-Power Jack said: No, Grump, the 1770's .... I was the only one shooting SS, then. SS? You mean Single Shot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hi-Power Jack Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 I "gamed" it, and had a "race" double-barrel pistol with a slicked up trigger and a long bayonet on the end of it .... And used BP320 powder, of course. Usually placed in the Top Ten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrispies Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Steve RA said: I don't think I'd call Jerry a specialist considering he's won more in various shooting endeavors than any of the others. I certainly think he should be included. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesquire Posted August 20, 2017 Author Share Posted August 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Steve RA said: I don't think I'd call Jerry a specialist considering he's won more in various shooting endeavors than any of the others. I certainly think he should be included. I think he is referring to him being more of a revolver guy than anything else in uspsa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJH Posted August 20, 2017 Share Posted August 20, 2017 (edited) ^^^^^This. If you look, the only national title in uspsa/ipsc pistol matches Jerry has won is in revolver (notice my 3 gun exception). Jerry is an unbelievable shooter, but in USPSA/IPSC handgun matches at the highest level, he is defiantly a specialist. He probably could have been a multi-division champ if he would of tried, but he never did. Edited August 20, 2017 by RJH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkrispies Posted August 21, 2017 Share Posted August 21, 2017 2 hours ago, Wesquire said: I think he is referring to him being more of a revolver guy than anything else in uspsa. Part of my thought process takes into consideration the degree to which the shooter has promoted the sport. I'd say that if you approached a crowd of non-USPSA shooters and asked them to name one USPSA shooter, or the one shooter they most admire and wish to emulate, Miculek is the name they'll know. And if they don't name him, it might just be his daughter-- same last name either way! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve RA Posted August 21, 2017 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Or his wife or maybe his father in law who was one of the highest ranking bulls eye shooters and a terrific gun smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted August 21, 2017 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Depends on what the criteria for inclusion are -- if it takes winning a world shoot, Cooper is out, as are many others..... I'm not sure the four Presidents on Mt. Rushmore are necessarily there, because they were or are the four greatest presidents in the history of the country -- but I could be wrong. Contributions to the Sport: Jeff Cooper would need to be considered along with the other attendees at the Columbia Conference. Brian makes that list for me pretty easily -- whatever price or penalty he may have paid competing in IPSC/USPSA at the same time as Rob Leatham -- is offset by his book, this website and the many competitors in the last 16 years who improved in practical shooting as the result of reading his book, participating in the discussions here, finding training partners, friends, etc. Would those folks have made it anyway? Perhaps, but they got there faster, as a result of information gleaned and connections made here. John Amidon goes on the list for his contributions to the rules, NROI, and for the institutional knowledge he possessed. So does Dave Thomas -- for taking the first steps needed in beginning to turn the organization from an all-volunteer model to something resembling a professional operation. Want to talk trainers -- Rob, Jerry Barnhart, Todd Jarrett and many others go on the list. I also think Range Officers and Competitors, run of the mill competitors and ROs get considered for contributions to the sport. Without either of them, it wouldn't exist. This list is by no means inclusive -- as the history of the sport evolves, other names will get added for consideration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesquire Posted August 21, 2017 Author Share Posted August 21, 2017 12 hours ago, Nik Habicht said: Depends on what the criteria for inclusion are -- if it takes winning a world shoot, Cooper is out, as are many others..... I'm not sure the four Presidents on Mt. Rushmore are necessarily there, because they were or are the four greatest presidents in the history of the country -- but I could be wrong. Contributions to the Sport: Jeff Cooper would need to be considered along with the other attendees at the Columbia Conference. Brian makes that list for me pretty easily -- whatever price or penalty he may have paid competing in IPSC/USPSA at the same time as Rob Leatham -- is offset by his book, this website and the many competitors in the last 16 years who improved in practical shooting as the result of reading his book, participating in the discussions here, finding training partners, friends, etc. Would those folks have made it anyway? Perhaps, but they got there faster, as a result of information gleaned and connections made here. John Amidon goes on the list for his contributions to the rules, NROI, and for the institutional knowledge he possessed. So does Dave Thomas -- for taking the first steps needed in beginning to turn the organization from an all-volunteer model to something resembling a professional operation. Want to talk trainers -- Rob, Jerry Barnhart, Todd Jarrett and many others go on the list. I also think Range Officers and Competitors, run of the mill competitors and ROs get considered for contributions to the sport. Without either of them, it wouldn't exist. This list is by no means inclusive -- as the history of the sport evolves, other names will get added for consideration. They were picked because they were considered the best presidents. The top 4 generally consists of Lincoln, Washington, FDR, and Jefferson. Mount Rushmore was done before FDR, and Teddy is usually around #5 on most polls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nik Habicht Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 6 hours ago, Wesquire said: They were picked because they were considered the best presidents. The top 4 generally consists of Lincoln, Washington, FDR, and Jefferson. Mount Rushmore was done before FDR, and Teddy is usually around #5 on most polls. Not according to the creator of the Memorial -- see here.... Best apparently had little to do with it..... Contribution however did.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nunez Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 (edited) On 8/19/2017 at 8:58 AM, Sarge said: That makes me laugh out loud. Even on the third viewing. Thank you sir. Edited August 22, 2017 by nunez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motosapiens Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 (edited) I wouldn't put anyone on the list who was *proven* to have accepted a time he knew was incorrect at a major match. But also I would make sure to not put ONLY old white guys on the list. Statues and sculptures seem to be attracting alot of attention from the more racially divisive elements of society these days. Edited August 22, 2017 by motosapiens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesquire Posted August 22, 2017 Author Share Posted August 22, 2017 1 hour ago, motosapiens said: I wouldn't put anyone on the list who was *proven* to have accepted a time he knew was incorrect at a major match. But also I would make sure to not put ONLY old white guys on the list. Statues and sculptures seem to be attracting alot of attention from the more racially divisive elements of society these days. Who did that? I'm never in on the gossip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 9 hours ago, Wesquire said: Who did that? I'm never in on the gossip http://www.doodieproject.com/index.php?/topic/4962-is-it-cheating-to-accept-a-time-you-know-is-wrong/page-7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcc7x7 Posted August 29, 2017 Share Posted August 29, 2017 On 8/18/2017 at 9:31 PM, Sarge said: I'll give you guys this much, you have a lot of guts. I mean, these are Brian's forums after all. And I doubt he ever crushed beer cans with a Nationals trophy. On 8/18/2017 at 9:32 PM, Sarge said: This isn't Talladega nights. Yes and Amen Doing it right is a lot more than just doing it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now