Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Carry optics


Onepocket

Recommended Posts

Yeah, if we're going to promote something, let's promote singlestack, because every reasonable person already *has* a 1911 (and that's my preferred division, heh heh).

Really? Single Stack--ever tried to get in SS Nationals. SS needs no help. :cheers:

Yes, I shot nats last year. Had no trouble getting in.... but I read the instructions.

But it should be promoted at the local level, with more ss-specific matches. USPSA has done nothing to promote this division. In fact, the only people promoting it have been the ones that wanted it in the first place......... :o

Are you talking SS or CO now? I am a MD and I don't "promote" any division at my matches. I support all USPSA Divisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 392
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Apparently Phil had a financial interest in setting a weight limit and getting the division approved.

Where is he working now?

I would be very careful of accusing someone in print.

Phil can dispute it if he wants but Smith and Wesson lobbied USPSA for the division, now Phil is a paid shooter for Smith and Wesson.

Facts are facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, if we're going to promote something, let's promote singlestack, because every reasonable person already *has* a 1911 (and that's my preferred division, heh heh).

Really? Single Stack--ever tried to get in SS Nationals. SS needs no help. :cheers:

Yes, I shot nats last year. Had no trouble getting in.... but I read the instructions.

But it should be promoted at the local level, with more ss-specific matches. USPSA has done nothing to promote this division. In fact, the only people promoting it have been the ones that wanted it in the first place......... :o

Are you talking SS or CO now? I am a MD and I don't "promote" any division at my matches. I support all USPSA Divisions.

I'm talking about SS, and mostly just mocking the idea that USPSA is on the hook for promoting the particular division that I favor. As I understand it a bunch of nice old guys wanted SS, so instead of making the pres do it, they put on a bigazz match and did it themselves, and they keep it going, and that's the way it should be imho. I am grateful to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slight thread drift but I assume all you on this thread who think CO should be sacked also believe PCC should not become a provisional division as well?

Yep. PCC is for RIFLES and, despite being fun for those who own them, doesn't even belong in the discussion.

Edited by teros135
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are about a half a dozen guys in my area that are gearing up for CO for when the outdoor match season begins around March. Keep in mind there are a lot of area's that can't shoot matches year round. Once it warms up and the outdoor match season starts I think interest will continue to grow. I can see it becoming more popular than L10 and Rev in a few years. Just be patient and give it a few seasons to grow. It won't happen overnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are about a half a dozen guys in my area that are gearing up for CO for when the outdoor match season begins around March. Keep in mind there are a lot of area's that can't shoot matches year round. Once it warms up and the outdoor match season starts I think interest will continue to grow. I can see it becoming more popular than L10 and Rev in a few years. Just be patient and give it a few seasons to grow. It won't happen overnight.

Are these guys already USPSA members?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to be throwing around the statements "it will attract new shooters" and "it will not atract new shooters" like they are scientifically proven facts ..... It's all conjecture and anecdotal evidence at best at this point ... No one really knows what will happen until it happens. Who wants to argue that SS, L10 & Revo have high enough participation levels to warrent keeping them as divisions yet they've been around for years .... Once the division is made real and is around for a couple of years, only then will you know if it's worth keeping ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to be throwing around the statements "it will attract new shooters" and "it will not atract new shooters" like they are scientifically proven facts ..... It's all conjecture and anecdotal evidence at best at this point ... No one really knows what will happen until it happens. Who wants to argue that SS, L10 & Revo have high enough participation levels to warrent keeping them as divisions yet they've been around for years .... Once the division is made real and is around for a couple of years, only then will you know if it's worth keeping ..

Too much common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to be throwing around the statements "it will attract new shooters" and "it will not atract new shooters" like they are scientifically proven facts ..... It's all conjecture and anecdotal evidence at best at this point ... No one really knows what will happen until it happens. Who wants to argue that SS, L10 & Revo have high enough participation levels to warrent keeping them as divisions yet they've been around for years .... Once the division is made real and is around for a couple of years, only then will you know if it's worth keeping ..

I'm getting flashbacks to Pelosi's statement about Obamacare.

But in all seriousness, I agree with what you're saying to a certain extent.

CO was granted provisional status based on the arguments and rationale that it would help grow the sport. I'm sure you can understand that any time an individual or group makes an unsubstantiated claim or rationale, there will be debate.

Edited by d_striker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to be throwing around the statements "it will attract new shooters" and "it will not atract new shooters" like they are scientifically proven facts ..... It's all conjecture and anecdotal evidence at best at this point ... No one really knows what will happen until it happens. Who wants to argue that SS, L10 & Revo have high enough participation levels to warrent keeping them as divisions yet they've been around for years .... Once the division is made real and is around for a couple of years, only then will you know if it's worth keeping ..

I'm getting flashbacks to Pelosi's statement about Obamacare.

But in all seriousness, I agree with what you're saying to a certain extent.

CO was granted provisional status based on the arguments and rationale that it would help grow the sport. I'm sure you can understand that any time an individual or group makes an unsubstantiated claim or rationale, there will be debate.

Debating is a good thing. You can't fault someone for having an opinion that CO will grow the sport. Only time will tell if the that rationale was valid. I wasn't around then, but I wonder what the rationale was for open. I'll bet someone used the same rationale for open. How many off the street join USPSA to shoot open-not many, but open is a big part of USPSA. I can see people joining USPSA because of off-the-shelf CO guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last provisional division to become a full division was SS. It was supposed to be provisional with data collection for three years, but after ~ 1 year the BOD voted to halt the provisional data collection and experiment and to make it a full division.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are about a half a dozen guys in my area that are gearing up for CO for when the outdoor match season begins around March. Keep in mind there are a lot of area's that can't shoot matches year round. Once it warms up and the outdoor match season starts I think interest will continue to grow. I can see it becoming more popular than L10 and Rev in a few years. Just be patient and give it a few seasons to grow. It won't happen overnight.

Are these guys already USPSA members?

Yes. The lowest class shooter is a B class PRD. And that would be me. The others gearing up are B class through M class. An Open class shooter, four Production shooters, and one Limited shooter.

Edited by JGus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What year was that. Why did they feel the need for a single stack division? Again just asking!

I'm going to say somewhere between 2005-8. You'd need to look through BOD meeting minutes....

Actually narrowed it down a little by way of rulebooks: The division exists in the 2008 rulebook. I'm thinking '06 or possibly '07 was the provisional year. Probably '07 -- I'm thinking the push to make it official was due to the new rulebook coming out. So I'd start by looking at the Fall Board meeting for 2006 to look for the vote to establish the provisional division/approve its equipment rules, and then to look at fall 07 for the final approval.

It's possible that I'm off by a year -- but starting in 2006 should allow you to bracket....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only criticism of CO is that it would have been nice to be able to use any gun already Production approved. As it is I had to buy a gun that met weight, versus being able to use one of several PRD guns I already own that didn't make weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...