reloader901 Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 (edited) The short version is I used to shoot local IPSC matches in the 1990's. Was never chrono'd and didn't have one at the time. Typically shot .45 ACP with 5.1-5.3 gn of 231 with 230gn lead bullets. Bought some CFE Pistol today thinking I would try it. Went to Hodgdon's site today to compare CFE with Win 231. (I'm not including the CFE specs here). Hodgson's Reloading Data Center: For 230 gn bullets it says the low end for Win 231 is 4.3 gn and the high end is 5.3 gn. The book I used in the 1990's "Speer Reloading Manual number 11" (1987) says the range for Win 231 with 230gn bullet is: 5.1 - 5.6gn Has Win 231 changed in the past 25 years? Edited March 31, 2015 by reloader901 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkreutz Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 No, just the lawyers have gotten more timid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thermobollocks Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 It may very well have changed over that long of a time, but remember also that whatever Hodgdon uses and whatever Speer uses on bullets may be different. Same deal if they use different primers, cases, and so on. Check on the OAL and the bullet profile for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaggerJoe Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 If you like 231, try some Hodgdon HP-38. I've been told it's the same powder. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reloader901 Posted March 31, 2015 Author Share Posted March 31, 2015 If you like 231, try some Hodgdon HP-38. I've been told it's the same powder. It isn't so much that I like 231... just I started with 231, I've been using it for many years, and was too lazy to try something else. After reading your post I compared Win 231 and HP-38 (.45acp, 230 grain bullet) here: http://www.hodgdonreloading.com/data/pistol The specs are exactly the same... interesting. I'm still wondering about my original post question. I just ordered a couple of reloading manuals from my local library (Speer from 2007, and Hornady 2007). I am interested to see what the 231 specs are in those manuals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnote Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 No, just the lawyers have gotten more timid. its all about lawsuits and conservative data. Their goal is not in line with our goal of power factor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkreutz Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 If you like 231, try some Hodgdon HP-38. I've been told it's the same powder. It isn't so much that I like 231... just I started with 231, I've been using it for many years, and was too lazy to try something else. After reading your post I compared Win 231 and HP-38 (.45acp, 230 grain bullet) here: http://www.hodgdonreloading.com/data/pistol The specs are exactly the same... interesting. I'm still wondering about my original post question. I just ordered a couple of reloading manuals from my local library (Speer from 2007, and Hornady 2007). I am interested to see what the 231 specs are in those manuals. That's because HP38 and W231 are the same powders. Long time known fact confirmed by Hodgdon and Winchester. That there is a difference is a myth that just won't go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now