Religious Shooter Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Where are the links that show two BOD directors "resigned in large part due to issues with the ED as well?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strick Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 I am still curious how a letter from an employee to the BOD gets to a person that is not on the BOD and then gets on FB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
38SuperDub Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 I am still curious how a letter from an employee to the BOD gets to a person that is not on the BOD and then gets on FB. Dude - did you not just see all the famous people who's noodie pics got out on the internet? Hackers!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Smith Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 I am still curious how a letter from an employee to the BOD gets to a person that is not on the BOD and then gets on FB. Agreed. One observation here, expense accounts do sometimes have entries that lack receipts. That doesn't mean that they should be left unreconciled - the expenses should be documented and either be approved or denied promptly. I'm trying to not take sides, but it's hard to not look at this is sloppy bookkeeping. And an auditor should not be letting something like this pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkCO Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Where are the links that show two BOD directors "resigned in large part due to issues with the ED as well?" Links? There is still such a thing as talking to a person, it is not yet forbidden. The A1 and A6 Directors resigned after a motion was made, and defeated, specifically regarding the ED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remoandiris Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Now the Face Book posting is not available ? (The letter is still available on the phobucket link) If you're talking about the posting on the A6 page, it is still available. Those who have wondered about how Charles Bond got his hands on it, that is a VERY good question. I'm sure a lot of members would like to know how that happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkCO Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 (edited) I'd certainly like to know how it got into the public domain as well. I am also concerned about legal action of the employee. Resignation under duress, in some states, is the same as wrongful termination, especially if there is a Whistle Blower statute in Washington, and she said she had legal counsel. Edited September 18, 2014 by MarkCO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctay Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Given the proclivity toward drama I wouldn't be shocked to find out that the ap clerk resigned due to other personality conflicts and just used this issue to cause problems. Who better to help you give Uspsa a black eye than Charles Bond and the A6 Facebook page? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron169 Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Given the proclivity toward drama I wouldn't be shocked to find out that the ap clerk resigned due to other personality conflicts and just used this issue to cause problems. Who better to help you give Uspsa a black eye than Charles Bond and the A6 Facebook page? I was thinking the exact same thing myself. I've seen numerous examples of people quitting and trying to shift the blame to someone else. Although the fact that she sought legal council is rather unique, as well as the fact that she sent the letter to her legal council as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkCO Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Given the proclivity toward drama I wouldn't be shocked to find out that the ap clerk resigned due to other personality conflicts and just used this issue to cause problems. Who better to help you give Uspsa a black eye than Charles Bond and the A6 Facebook page? I was thinking the exact same thing myself. I've seen numerous examples of people quitting and trying to shift the blame to someone else. Although the fact that she sought legal council is rather unique, as well as the fact that she sent the letter to her legal council as well. Certainly possible, and why I am concerned. Given the multiple issues that have faced USPSA in the past few months, I think there already is a black eye. Given that USPSA is a firearms organization, the resigning employee referred to other issues in the resignation letter and the fact that she has legal counsel, to me, it muddies the waters significantly if the intent is to build a legal case against USPSA. Given all of that, it might be a simple explanation, and it might be something nefarious. For those reasons alone, regardless of whether or not there was any impropriety by USPSA executives, staff or contractors, it sure seems like the right thing to do would be to hire a 3rd party to sort it out and issue a report that the members, staff and BOD will all be guaranteed to see. If USPSA personnel are in the clear, done deal. If not, the evidence will be present to clean house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chills1994 Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Is Val still there? Or did she quit too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Is Val still there? Or did she quit too? she was there last week. She replied to my email anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chills1994 Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Okay, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinka Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Given the proclivity toward drama I wouldn't be shocked to find out that the ap clerk resigned due to other personality conflicts and just used this issue to cause problems. Who better to help you give Uspsa a black eye than Charles Bond and the A6 Facebook page? I'm also leaning in this direction, seems like there are a lot of personality conflicts these days though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chills1994 Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Chess...not checkers. Maybe Corn and Bond already knew about the missing $144,000 before the 2 area directors quit??? And they quit knowing that the book keeper lady was going to resign next and a public spectacle was going to be made about it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctay Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Point of clarification - From my understanding there is no "missing" $144K. Simply $144k that isn't reconciled into proper expense accounts. Pretty big difference. I would love to know where Bond got this info. If the AP clerk emailed it to him it sure looks like she knew right where to go to cause problems. That speaks to me about the motivations of the source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zhunter Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 ctay I could be wrong, but reading the resignation letter, it sounds like Barbara tried multiple times to reconcile the books, but the ED was unwilling to provide the receipts. Hence the problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctay Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 That is what I read as well. That still doesn't mean missing - just means unreconciled. Missing means missing - unreconciled just means I don't know where to put it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterthefish Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 That is what I read as well. That still doesn't mean missing - just means unreconciled. Missing means missing - unreconciled just means I don't know where to put it. No. Unreconciled means there is insufficient documentation (ie a receipt) to account for the expenditure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjb45 Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 If there is smoke is there fire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motosapiens Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 If there is smoke is there fire? sometimes there's just one of those showbiz smoke machines that's designed to entertain and create illusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remoandiris Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Who better to help you give Uspsa a black eye than Charles Bond and the A6 Facebook page? Geez man, now you're starting to win me over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadeslade Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Me, too. You got me convinced ctay. Nothing to see here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctay Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 Me, too. You got me convinced ctay. Nothing to see here. Well, that's not what I said but whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjb45 Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 motosapiens,You crack me up. That is really funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now