Jump to content
Brian Enos's Forums... Maku mozo!

Anyone have issues with PMAG 40 and Taccom +5?


Kevin Holman

Recommended Posts

I had my first mag related failure on the timer in a match this weekend. Had to dump it go to backup mag.

It was a PMAG 40 with a taccom +5, using the factory PMAG40 spring.

It was bang - click - rack - bang - click - rack. Sometimes I'd get two bangs before click. It just wouldn't feed the cartridges up fast enough, and my bolt just went home on an empty chamber.

The spring on a Nordic 48 rounder is about 1" longer, but the 3 round higher capacity and length makes the two springs about equal.

Fluke?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Factory M193. 2.230" to 2.240" Been shooting this lot of ammo for many years, I bought a ton.

No binding when working follower, but it is a bit "rougher" feeling on all my PMAG40's than on my Gen 2 30 round PMAGS. Nothing significant, and I cannot get it to hang up loading and unloading it. The bullets just rise up slowly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had my first mag related failure on the timer in a match this weekend. Had to dump it go to backup mag.

It was a PMAG 40 with a taccom +5, using the factory PMAG40 spring.

It was bang - click - rack - bang - click - rack. Sometimes I'd get two bangs before click. It just wouldn't feed the cartridges up fast enough, and my bolt just went home on an empty chamber.

The spring on a Nordic 48 rounder is about 1" longer, but the 3 round higher capacity and length makes the two springs about equal.

Fluke?

I have 6 40 round pmags set up that way with no issues so far. Are you leaving them loaded? I don't maybe that is the issue.

Pat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point......I'd have to either say fluke, assembly or parent magazine issue. We've got over a thousand extensions out there so far and this is the first issue of a failure we've heard of.

standard lower? or some billet lower? I've heard that on some billet lowers you'd have to trim up the 'over insertion' tabs to make sure that the parent G3 magazines seats properly. I've not run into this issue with any mil spec lowers or the CTR-02 lower that I personally run.

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Standard forged lower (believe it is a Rock River, would have to check) and been running this lower for many years. Young super light carrier, lightend rifle buffer, sprinco spring, Syrac adjustable gas block. Been running 100% since the day she was put together.

I'll see if I can repro.... i'm sure hoping its a fluke. Good to hear it isn't common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Used mine in 2 matches so far, one if which was a muddy mess, and no problems with mine. I do however download them by 2 rounds just as I would a standard 30 round mag. I don't know if that's necessary or not, but it's worked. Also , I was never able to get a full 48 rounds in my pmag +nordic extension so maybe that's another reason I've gotten used to down loading by 2.

Regardless, no problems here. I've got 2 as well and have used both equally.

Just something you may want to try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Used mine in several matches without any issues at all. If say fluke, but if you have two of the 40rd PMAGs I would pull the springs and followers and see if there is any difference, just in case.

Leaving the springs compressed for a long period of time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found the issue guys. It has nothing to do with the TACCOM +5's.

It is a tolerance stacking problem, caused by two things - my Young Machine superlight carrier, and a change in the PMAG design.

Older Gen M2 PMAGS don't exhibit the issue.

These PMAG 40's have a space between feedlips of .425" to .430". My PMAG Gen M2 and all my USGI mags have a space between feedlips of .450" or greater. What I found, is using the PMAG 40, there is MUCH more resistance seating on a closed bolt, even with an EMPTY magazine. The feedlips are rammed into the underside of the carrier into the feelip cut-out channels. With an empty magazine, there was a lot of resistance which was slowing down the bolt bigtime. If I cycled the bolt slowly on an empty mag, the PMAG 40 would even hang up the carrier and it would stop.

I went and grabbed a BCM carrier (about as milspec as you can get) as this problem was non-existent. With the young manufacturing carrier, and a new PMAG 40, I can even see the carrier shaving plastic from the feedlips.

I have been running this carrier since summer of 2011 through several seasons of 3gun without a single hiccup of any kind.

So, the new PMAG's are definitely measurably different on the feedlips, but I tried the PMAG40 body (no follower or spring) in 6 other milspec rifles, and cant replicate the drag except for one, which is not as pronounced and is a WMD nickel boron carrier.

Looks like I will be buying that JP LMOS carrier after all. I assume that is what 90% of you guys are running without issue on the PMAG 40's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't help you with the magazines......but we have the +5's ready to go.

I've heard that the G3's (all G3's.....20, 30, 40 etc) were causing some issues with some mag wells, and all. Also.....people needed to down load one shell to get them to seat. When we designed the +5, we actually made it 1/2 shell dia longer to make sure that you can seat the mag with no shell stack issues. Some people have even gotten a little sneaky.....not used the factory lock plate, taped the extension on and got 46 rounds in their magazines. Go figure....3 gunners....always gettin one more.

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...