Tangram Posted November 28, 2004 Share Posted November 28, 2004 Quick check. Index: head-arms-upper torso moves together - driven by eye snapping vision. If there is a target lower than others I bend at the waist to engage it. Yes, no, maybe. (Thinking of an El Prez type with the middle target much lower or IDPA qualifier stages.) Rick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingman Posted November 28, 2004 Share Posted November 28, 2004 I don't bend at the waist on lower targets. I have found if I do its a little bit slower. I just move my arms down the small amount. The other thing is for instance if you had a target almost lying flat behind hardcover basically about 3 feet from you if you bent over to engage that you would be way off balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangram Posted November 29, 2004 Author Share Posted November 29, 2004 The other thing is for instance if you had a target almost lying flat behind hardcover basically about 3 feet from you if you bent over to engage that you would be way off balance. Ahh the classic nosedive move .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
38supPat Posted December 1, 2004 Share Posted December 1, 2004 Go prone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benos Posted December 21, 2004 Share Posted December 21, 2004 As a general rule, avoid "breaking your index" during a string of fire. Almost always, once the gun has reached its final position and your index is "set," never move anything above the waist. The beauty of a properly trained index is that, over time, it will do much of the work for you. be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ankeny Posted December 21, 2004 Share Posted December 21, 2004 Would an exception to the general rule be an array with targets at various heights, in which case the arms would move? I am thinking poppers in combination with paper, such as Bang and Clang. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duane Thomas Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Or how about the IDPA classifier, from left to right three targets at 6', 4' and 5'. How best to compensate for the elevation changes while keeping your index? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now