ZackJones Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 I'll try to go into detail...maybe with a dedicated thread(s)...when I have a minute. Here is a quick summary: Separate threads for each agenda item would be nice . I'd like to hear more about the review of unload and show clear command as well as USPSA/SCSA merger (makes sense) and also SCSA classification system. I'd like to see divisions like we have in USPSA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kneelingatlas Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 I'm less concerned with the BOD publishing a number that anyone with a calculator can come up with, than I am knowing how they come up with the HHF. If it is shooter X at nationals, say so. If we don't have any data for a given division so we just guessed, say that too. If there is some elaborate formula, publish the formula. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 - Publishing HHFs...when I asked the BOD members that were around about a past BOD decision about sharing the HHFs. The consensus was that they weren't to be published, but might be shared with those operating a Hit Factor Calculator* or the like. Perhaps I don't understand the issue, but can't the HHF for a division be exactly determined by one shooter with one single score? If my HF is 7.7512, and the uspsa website shows me at 71.2%, it seems like childs play to calculate the hhf. Are we only trying to keep the hhf's secret from english majors? No.. that is unpossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flexmoney Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 I'd like to hear more about the review of unload and show clear command as well as USPSA/SCSA merger (makes sense) and also SCSA classification system. I'd like to see divisions like we have in USPSA. The ULASC thing was a flip and catch discussion. Steel Challenge was initially setup as a separate legal business. Merging gets us to one set of bookkeeping, etc. El Prez came up with a new/easier way of doing the classifiers for SC. (I don't have those details in front of me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosshoss Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 - We will have to retire a handful of classifiers, due to the round count and shootability of 6 vs 8 round Revolver division (now that minor-8 Revolver will be coming in). Hmmmm some of the new 13 series classifiers fall into this area I wonder if they will be retired also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZackJones Posted January 7, 2014 Share Posted January 7, 2014 The ULASC thing was a flip and catch discussion. Steel Challenge was initially setup as a separate legal business. Merging gets us to one set of bookkeeping, etc. El Prez came up with a new/easier way of doing the classifiers for SC. (I don't have those details in front of me) I don't like seeing the flip and catch thing. Just bugs me for some reason. All for the merger for bookkeeping, etc. It only makes sense. I hope you'll post more on the classification stuff after you've had a chance to review your notes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chills1994 Posted April 1, 2014 Share Posted April 1, 2014 Sooo...did the high hit factors get published yet? Or a records page on USPSA.org of the 5/10/15 best or highest hit factors shot per each classifier by division? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now